Understanding how “favors” are done. The MSM is simply running out of excuses.

HRC’s email scandal is bringing up the other far larger and more dangerous scandal- that of her accepting bribes as a course of doing business from companies, people and countries that do not have America’s interest at heart.  The key isn’t the immediacy of the bribe to the favor, but the fact bribes (or contributions if you will) are given with the expectation of a favor being granted at some point in the future. It is a “one hand washes the other” deal.  (Seriously, rent the Godfather for a reference!)

The Daily Caller highlights just a few what I’m sure are hundreds of events.

Visa Problems

One email sent on Sept. 22, 2009 contains several instances of Clinton helping out a couple of political allies and donors who were facing roadblocks at their multinational corporations.

Recounting conversations she had during a meeting with Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman at the New York Stock Exchange, Clinton informed Kris Balderston, then the State Department’s special representative for global partnerships, that Schwarzman and Mickey Kantor, an attorney who served as secretary of commerce in the Bill Clinton White House, were seeking help in obtaining a visa for a person whose name is redacted in the email.

“What’s status?” Clinton asked Balderston.

Clinton had several reasons to help Blackstone. The company has donated between $250,000 and $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. And the company’s president, Tony James, has recently said he plans to support Clinton for president.

‘Help’ Wanted

In the same email, Clinton relayed that she had talked to David Cote, the CEO of the conglomerate, Honeywell, who said he “wanted help” with a business issue, the details of which are also redacted.

“He also complained about export control regs that intertere w sales,” Clinton added. “He said the State Dept is the holdup and gave example of nuts and bolts for an engine being labelled as ‘dual use and therefore couldn’t be exported.’”

“Andrew may know about this,” she added.

Honeywell is also a Clinton Foundation donor.

The business executives appeared happy with the Clinton meeting. Balderston responded to her notes, stating that participants at the meeting where “very happy” and that they wanted “to make it an annual event.”

Powerful Democratic Senator’s Daughter Needed A Job, So He Asked Hillary

In Aug. 2009, then-Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin reached out to Clinton and other State Department staff seeking to find a job for his daughter, Jennifer, at the agency’s Office of War Crimes.

Amid internal chatter — which included an email from one Clinton aide remarking that the office had a “very small with a limited number of slots” — Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, sent an email to her boss, which read “remind me to discuss with you how I want to play this out.” (RELATED: After Lobbying Hillary, Democratic Senator’s Daughter Was Hired At State)

Clinton wrote back, “we have to discuss soon so I can close the loop on this.”

Jennifer Harkin was soon hired at State’s Office of War Crimes, though there was no public announcement about the hire. Tom Harkin, a now-retired Democrat, gave Clinton a much-needed boost this summer when he endorsed her for president.

Bailout for A Blair

Clinton appeared willing to help out the child of another political ally. Cherie Blair, the wife of former British prime minister Tony Blair, contacted Clinton on April 3, 2009 in hopes of finding a job for her son, Nicholas.

Much of Blair’s email to Clinton is redacted, so it is unclear what kind of job she was seeking for her son. But Blair passed along Nicholas’ resume, and Clinton indicated she would help.

“I have passed on the info about [redacted] to my chief of staff. We will follow up. All the best,” she wrote to Blair.

And as we wind into the Trump U disaster- which was another get quick rich scheme for sure- we have Bill and his even bigger bribe- sixteen million dollars from Laureate International Universities- a for profit university system.  It is international so the obvious question is where does their funding come from (State Dept grants? or other federal sources?).

Education Company Pays The Bill For Dinner

In an Aug. 2, 2009 email, Clinton instructed her chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, to find a spot at an upcoming State Department dinner for a representative for Laureate International Universities, a for-profit education company.

Mills was able to secure a spot for a company representative, and months later, Bill Clinton was named an honorary chancellor at Laureate. He was paid $16 million until the end of his tenure earlier this year. (RELATED: New Emails Show Hillary Assisting For-Profit College That Paid Bill $16 Million)


Clinton’s favors reveal a certain “crassness,” Ken Boehm, the chairman of the ethics watchdog group, National Legal and Policy Center, told TheDC.

“The Hillary Clinton emails confirm that she used her position as Secretary of State as a favor mill for family, friends and — most of all — political supporters,” Boehm said.

“Now we know why she went to such lengths to hide her email traffic. Given the crassness of the disclosed emails, one can’t help but wonder what was on the deleted emails.”

Yes, we all wonder.  If these were ones she thought she could skate, what in the hell were in the ones she was afraid we would discover? But what we can conclude is that she was in fact in the favor asking and the favor giving business.  And she didn’t even try to hide well.

A real “let them eat cake” moment from the Left’s “Royals”.


Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Washington Post writer goes full racist in order to help cope with Brexit.

The article from the Post, written by one Kim Soffen, argues that what happened in Britain can’t happen here, because Britain has more whites than any other race.  Now, how she missed Ireland and Scotland overwhelmingly voting for “Remain” is a mystery.  And there isn’t a whiter group of whites out there than red-headed Irishmen!  So, the argument doesn’t hold just along racial lines.  Breitbart points out her mistake.

The Washington Post is reporting that U.S. might not be able to follow in the U.K.’s footsteps in reclaiming its economic independence because of the nation’s demographic makeup, which is the result of four decades of record high green card issuances to foreign nationals

In a piece entitled, “No, Brexit Isn’t A Good Sign For Trump,” Washington Post’s Kim Soffen writes:

“There are certainly similarities between the referendum and the [Trump] campaign. Both are largely driven by immigration… Both are nationalist movements. Both are an instance of the will of the people going against the wishes of the elite… And their demographic support looks quite similar too.”

Yet Soffen writes that Brexit may not be a harbinger for Donald Trump’s future electoral success because the U.S. does not have as many white voters as Britain does.

“Largely at issue here is demographics. The British electorate is overwhelmingly white – 87 percent of its population is, according to its 2011 census. That’s compared to the United States’ 74 percent in 2014. That difference is significant for what direction each country votes.”

Indeed, while establishment media has pushed the narrative that immigration is a much more significant issue in Europe than it is the U.S., the facts do not bear this out. The U.S. has accepted 10 million more migrants from outside its borders than the European Union has absorbed from outside its borders, even though the EU has 200 million more people than the United States. Indeed, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, minority babies now outnumber white babies in the United States.

She makes the assumption that ALL foreign born or second generation immigrants are socialists, or like distant big government bureaucrats telling them how to live their lives.  That is a big assumption.

While it is true blacks in America have been educated and socialized by liberal whites to hate and distrust America while being told they deserve any handouts, there are many black people, especially in the growing middle class that pays taxes, who do not like the idea of a government bureaucracy telling them how to live.  It’s a HUMAN thing, not a race thing!

I have a friend who is Haitian by birth, American by choice, works hard, believes in GOD  and does not like Obama’s vision of America.  I think he’s a Trumpster. I know he hates the vision of America Hillary offers.

Further, it is more the current media/education/politics that is setting the tone of what people think here rather than their skin color.  Do you think any Venezuelan who just got out of that nightmare thinks having it happen here is a good idea?

The Asians are  a culture of hard work, sacrifice, family and getting ahead with education and focus. Do you think any of that even sounds feasible in a EU type of governance? In fact, a recent SCOTUS decision that diversity is the key to education will screw Asians more than whites!   Do you think they are happy eight moron in DC just cost them a scholarship after they  aced all their classes?

Now don’t get me wrong. Comparing Trump to the Brexit victory is a mistake. And a shallow one for the WP writer. But it is her way of coping. Truth is Trump will lose because he’s Trump.  Clinton is a nightmare. But the hot mess who is Trump may be just a little worse.

And that’s the key. Not race.




Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

They lie. Muslim clerics do the typical dance. Nothing to see here.

Pam Geller, who is on her own sort of jihad to get America to wake up to the threat of radical Islam, points out that once again the clerics and spokesmen for the Mosques lie about their involvement/influence in a terror attack.  It is called “kitman”.

Now as I’ve pointed out before,  the FBI agents aren’t dumb, just hamstrung with ROE’s that prevent them actually investigating Muslim suspects.

This is a pattern in the Muslim community. After every jihad attack, the mosque of the jihadi lies about their involvement, their attendance, etc. — every time. Why are they lying? Because they are complicit. And they know their running dogs in the media will never question them.

Members fear “retribution” at the Vero mosque attended by Orlando shooter. Their adherents slaughter and then they “fear retribution”? Why not fear and oppose the Islamic texts and teachings inspiring this “holy war”? This is not a one-off. This is a worldwide war.

After the attempted mass murder in Garland Texas, the mosque that the Garland jihadis regularly attended lied about their involvement and attendance at the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix. Conflicting accounts came from mosque president Usama Shami, who said jihadi would-be murderers Ibrahim Simpson and Nadir Soofi attended prayers at the mosque but were not regular members. But they had been …. Ibrahim had been a member for 10 years.

The Boston bombers’ mosque, a notorious hotbed of jihad terror-related activity, lied about the Tsarnaev brothers. The Islamic Center of Greater Oklahoma City lied about what it preached to Colleen Hufford’s devout Muslim beheader, Jah’keem. One Ohio Mosque has been at the center of six jihad terror cases.

It’s part of a larger, often Saudi backed, plan to increase Islam in America. Remember, the goal is to fundamentally change America into an Islamic nation.  It may take generations, but that’s the goal, and the gay community needs to re-exam their loyalties. It would be in their best interest. Because the other side will never change. They haven’t for 1400 years.

These guys are not your friends.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Orlando, Chattanooga, San Bernardino were their versions of our drone strike. ISIS is using the tools it has.

Trust me, if it could get a hold of long range bombers or missiles, it would fling those at us too.

Obama’s theory is that America is big and being big it can “absorb” the punishment from random violence acted upon it by terrorists.  As long as it isn’t 9/11 types of attacks, most Americans will be upset for a few days and then stop paying attention.

In the case of the Orlando terrorist attack, they may be onto something because a few days after the attack, a small child is eaten by an alligator at Disney World and suddenly the people are tweeting about bad parents and Disney lawsuits.  One kid eaten by a prehistoric critter that didn’t know any better is a tragedy, a hundred dead and wounded men and women, all Americans, attacked by a ISIS drone named Omar is now about guns.

And the sheep are buying it! There was one commentary from a gay advocate blaming guns and demanding we all seek peace.  If this person were actually paying attention to demands of Islam, they would realize peace would be reached by the victorious Muslims a few seconds after the last infidels- including her- where destroyed!

My point is we need to stop acting or thinking like Westerners and start realizing that these attacks and any future attacks which are sure to come is the long range drone strike of the terrorist organization named ISIS. And unlike our ROE’s, where we fret about innocent causalities when making the decision to strike or not, ISIS drones are thinking how do they maximize their causalities. That alone puts them at an advantage of us.

The New York Times can say what they want, knowing full well they are lying in order to serve the globalist agenda.  But we know the truth, and as the NRA points out, we better arm ourselves. Because as long as the Left is offering up candidates like HRC, we aren’t going to get the help we need from the government to stay safe.

The trouble with Obama’s theory is a numbers game.  If Obama and his buddies, including Paul Ryan, bring in 100 immigrants from a fundamentalist culture, with two being actual ISIS plants, but none vetted at all, the danger of another strike has immensely increased.  Think about the numbers.  One terrorist killed and wounded 100 people.  Two terrorists killed and wounded 36 in California. Seven in Chattanooga and in Fort Hood it was 43.  Do the numbers.  That is 143 in just four high profile attack.  1..4..3..  almost 36 a clip! Which means if the two stealth terrorists active, that’s another seventy people dead and wounded.  441 immigrants were recently brought in, with four potential terrorists?  That’s a potential hundred and forty-four dead and wounded!!  And that’s just the start.  Don’t think about the homegrown, Islami-sized crew, like Alton Nolen, a convert who killed one woman and tried to cut the head off another woman.

Do you find that acceptable?

Obama and his people do.

Why? Because those in power aren’t ever going to suffer the “absorption cost” of their plans.  Some think that Obama is some kind of plant. I think the elites on the Right resist that description- as Andrew McCarthy points out by saying Obama is a globalist first and an American second- but I think with “Kitman” in play, we cannot rule one or the other out.

Sharia supremacists are not only shielded from scrutiny by U.S. intelligence but welcomed into the national-security apparatus. Barack Obama has spent his presidency cultivating Islamists, particularly from the international Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates in the United States. As we saw this week, he chafes at the term “radical Islam” — as do his Islamist advisers. At their insistence, he had instructional materials for training government agents purged of references to Islamic terms that illuminate the nexus between Muslim doctrine and jihadist terror.

Obama’s vaunted national-security strategy, “Countering Violent Extremism,” is Orwellian. The term CVE supplants identification of our jihadist enemies with the wooly notion that “violence” can be caused by any form of “extremism” — it has nothing to do with Islam. By transferring security responsibilities from government intelligence agents to Muslim “community leaders” (often, Islamist groups), CVE actually encourages violent extremism.

These steps have been reckless. They have made our nation more vulnerable to the kind of jihadist atrocities we saw last weekend in Orlando. So obvious is this that many Obama critics have gone from thinking the unthinkable to saying it aloud: The president of the United States seems to be intentionally betraying our national security; even if not squarely on the side of the terrorists, Obama is such an apologist for their Islamist grievances that he might as well be.

I don’t buy this. Oh, I believe Obama is betraying our national security, but I do not think he is doing so intentionally. Instead, he has the good intentions, such as they are, of a left-wing globalist. The president sees security as a matter of international stability, not of a single nation’s safety — not even of that single nation that has entrusted him with its security.

To grasp Obama’s conception of security, we must revisit a progressive fantasy oft-lamented in these columns, “moderate Islamists.” This is where the Muslim Brotherhood comes in.

Here in the West, “moderate Islamist” is a contradiction in terms. An Islamist is a Muslim who wants to impose sharia (Islam’s repressive law) on a society. In the United States, that would mean replacing our Constitution with a totalitarian, discriminatory system. That is an extremely radical goal, even if the Islamist forswears violence and promises to proceed in Fabian fashion. Therefore, from the perspective of our free society, Islamists are the very antithesis of moderates.

For a post-American transnational progressive like Obama, however, the context that matters is not our society. It is the world. He is the first president to see himself more as a citizen of the world who plays a critical role in American affairs than as an American who plays a critical role in international affairs.

Viewed globally, the Brotherhood seems — in fact, it is — more moderate than ISIS, al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, and other infamous terrorist groups. I say “other” terrorist groups because the Brotherhood surely is one, which is why it should be formally designated as such under U.S. law.

I can tell you that there are FBI/NSA/DOD guys and gals who are saying the same thing I and other cops have said about our PC driven, errant administrations, “Who gives a F how we got here, let’s do something about it!” But Obama will refuse and so will his pant-suited doppelganger when it comes to globalist agendas.

Over in England, a crazy man kills a young MP, who was a supporter of Britain remaining in the EU (the globalist agenda).  Immediately, a little to quickly, the “Remain” group claims the crazy guy is a “Brit-Ex”er and killed her as a political assassination.  His brother said he’s just crazy with no real agenda and hardly capable of reasoning out the details of the conflict.   Regardless, her death is being used to push back the vote that the establishment “Remain” politicians fear they are losing.

On a side note, it is a tad interesting a liberal left wing group that “reports” on domestic threats here in America, and I air quote the reports part because the Southern Poverty Law Center does not do what it claims at all, suddenly finds detailed receipts on this guy from 1999. This group will report on any white supremacists group around, but during my exposure to them, they couldn’t find a Hispanic, black or Muslim gang to save their souls. So it is interesting this group, within hours of the murder, in a foreign nation, decided on its own to research old files and found a receipt from 1999 where this guy bought plans from a American white supremacist group, that showed him how to make  a zip gun?  1999?  Why? Do they run every white murder suspect across the globe automatically?  There is more there for sure. (Like where did he get the ammunition? Did he build it, someone else?)

However, the bigger point goes back to what McCarthy says, there is a large Leftist group out there with an agenda to remake the world into a different shape.  How they get there, how many innocent people get hurt in the process is unknown, as is the “why” they would want to disrupt so many civilized societies.

Nevertheless, four things separate this very sophisticated organization from other jihadists: (1) The Brotherhood pretends to reject violent jihad, especially when dealing with Western audiences. (2) The Brotherhood opportunistically limits its overt support for jihad to situations that the international Left feels comfortable excusing (e.g., violence against “occupation” by Israel, or by American troops fighting Bush’s “unnecessary war of aggression” in Iraq). (3) The Brotherhood purports to condemn terrorist acts that it believes, judging from a cost-benefit analysis, are likelier to harm than to advance the sharia agenda (particularly the Brotherhood’s lucrative fundraising apparatus in the West). A good example is the 9/11 atrocities (but note that even there, the Brotherhood, like the rest of the Left, always adds that American foreign policy is jointly culpable). (4) The Brotherhood aggressively pursues a menu of nonviolent advocacy and sharia proselytism, known in Islamist ideology as dawah. As Brotherhood honcho and major Hamas backer Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi puts it, “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword but through dawah.”

Nevertheless, four things separate this very sophisticated organization from other jihadists: (1) The Brotherhood pretends to reject violent jihad, especially when dealing with Western audiences. (2) The Brotherhood opportunistically limits its overt support for jihad to situations that the international Left feels comfortable excusing (e.g., violence against “occupation” by Israel, or by American troops fighting Bush’s “unnecessary war of aggression” in Iraq). (3) The Brotherhood purports to condemn terrorist acts that it believes, judging from a cost-benefit analysis, are likelier to harm than to advance the sharia agenda (particularly the Brotherhood’s lucrative fundraising apparatus in the West). A good example is the 9/11 atrocities (but note that even there, the Brotherhood, like the rest of the Left, always adds that American foreign policy is jointly culpable). (4) The Brotherhood aggressively pursues a menu of nonviolent advocacy and sharia proselytism, known in Islamist ideology as dawah. As Brotherhood honcho and major Hamas backer Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi puts it, “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword but through dawah.”

And there it is.  The people Obama thinks he can engage with people who are dedicated in eliminating the world Obama lives in, or at least the world Obama shares with us.  He may want to live in Sharia, since he’d be thought a leader and be able to avoid most of what Sharia demands.

Is he sincere? I don’t think so, but McCarthy does.  I just think Obama is a chaos maker, like most Leftists.   A punisher of past sins of others. And he’s intent on punishing us for what he perceives is our nations atrocities.  It is amazing to see.  But hard to watch.

Update: this guy gets it.


Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Obama’s Kitman. He says his advisors told him never to mention “radical”.

Obama’s petulant reaction to Trump’s demand to identify the enemy clearly was a telling moment for anyone watching.  Since HRC also follows this reluctance, it is sad to think we’ll be victimized for another four years (or eight) and not be able to speak the name of what is killing all of us.  Just imagine.

Obama claims he has no advisor tell him if he uses “a name” like radical Islam it will help defeat the enemy. He also claims he has ISIS under control.

To that I say, “fire your advisors- they suck!” (Except this one, who apparently Obama missed when looking for advice.)  Seriously, it’s like Al Capone saying he can’t find a guy in his organized crime syndicate who is telling him committing crime is a bad idea, so he’s continuing his criminal behavior.  Even the dumbest American or liberal (same thing) has to pause long enough to go “hmm.. that doesn’t sound right.”

Mr. Obama did not name Trump, referring to him only as a “politician who tweets and appears on cable news shows.” I’m not inclined to defend Trump, and will not do so now; his notion that we bar all Muslims from traveling to the United States is laden with unintended consequences. But President Obama’s studied refusal to acknowledge the reality of Islamic-inspired violence has helped to create the Trump phenomenon. In fact, it may well be the greatest contribution to Trump’s success. Some say that presidential elections are often referenda on the last guy: Carter was the anti-Nixon; Reagan was the anti-Carter; Clinton was the anti-Bush; and Obama was the anti-Bush. Thus, Trump is the anti-Obama.

Obama fumed at those who criticize his administration for refusing to use the words “radical Islam.” He mocked the idea that language matters: “Not once has an adviser of mine said, ‘Man, if we use that phrase, we are going to turn this whole thing around.’ Not once.” He never tires of slaying straw men. It’s not a matter of intoning magic words. The critique of Obama is that he has so often projected the image of Islam’s defense counsel instead of America’s commander-in-chief.

In fairness (though Obama is rarely fair to those he differs with), it should be noted that George W. Bush was also at pains to shun the impression that the U.S. was at war with Islam. But here’s the difference: Bush never gave the impression that he wasn’t on America’s side, and Obama consistently does. Moreover, when Obama or members of his administration stubbornly refuse to acknowledge what everyone knows to be true, it makes people feel unsafe.

In 2009, Col. Nidal Hasan, marinated in the writings of Islamic extremists, jumped on a table, shouted “Allahu Akbar,” and opened fire on 45 soldiers, killing 13. Obama was unsure of his motive and cautioned Americans against “jumping to conclusions.” Until late 2015, the administration declined to call Fort Hood a terrorist attack, preferring the Newspeakish “workplace violence.”

When ISIS-linked terrorists decapitated their American captive James Foley and released the video on the internet, Obama went golfing. He later said he regretted this, but that couldn’t erase the signal of indifference.

After Islamic extremists in Paris attacked the Charlie Hebdo offices and a Jewish supermarket in January 2015, Obama spoke of vicious killers who “randomly shoot a bunch of folks at a deli in Paris.” But the attacks could not have been more pointed — a satirical magazine that had caricatured Muhammad and a Jewish store. Did Obama misspeak, or was he downplaying the Islamic extremist element? When 50 world leaders, including those of Great Britain, France, Germany, Israel and Russia marched in Paris to show solidarity against terrorism, Obama skipped the event and failed to send a high-ranking surrogate.

After Muslim terrorists turned the Brussels airport into an abattoir in March, Mr. Obama attended a baseball game in Cuba. Before the bodies had all been buried, he danced the tango in Argentina.

It’s not that Obama is soft on religiously inspired violence. At the National Prayer Breakfast, he cautioned Americans against “(getting) on our high horse,” because during the Crusades and the Inquisition, terrible deeds were committed “in the name of Christ.” While Obama played historical tit for tat, terrorists were plotting their next strike.

The pattern has recurred throughout his presidency — from the Boston marathon bombing, to the Paris attacks, to “clock boy,” to the San Bernardino shootings and now the Orlando attack, Obama has downplayed Islamist motivations and dismissed American fears. The Atlantic magazine reported that Obama frequently reminds his staff that Americans are more likely to die in their bathtubs than in terror attacks.

What Mona Charen is describing is an Islamic technique all Americans should become familiar with- Kitman.


Quran (16:106) – Establishes that there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.

Quran (3:28) – This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to “guard themselves” against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim should appear friendly to non-Muslims, even though they should not feel that way..

Quran (9:3)“…Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters…” The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.  (The next verse refers only to those who have a personal agreement with Muhammad as individuals – see Ibn Kathir (vol 4, p 49)

Quran (40:28) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who had to “hide his faith” among those who are not believers.

Is Obama a Muslim?  Who knows or cares. But he is clearly a Muslim sympathizer, who is very familiar with the religion and its tenets.  He grew up in a Sunni Muslim home, went to Muslim schools, studied the Koran.  That’s just the facts. For the first time in our history, we have a President raised and schooled by what could be argued is the enemy of our type of civilization. It would be akin to having a President in 1940 that showed up to work wearing a Nazi uniform.  Even the most loyal party member, whether Democrat or Republican, would go “Dude, what the..??! Okay, you’re out of here! ”

However, our society has been educated in moral relativism and political correctness and is numb to outrageous behavior by anyone. So when Obama gets madder at Trump’s ramblings than losing dozens of his own citizens to Islamic Terrorism, people just shrug their collective shoulders.

But they shouldn’t. Because, and this is important, if an enemy declares war on your ENTIRE civilization and  the guy in charge of your side willingly ignores it, it’s still a war.  Just one you’ll lose quicker.

Sebastian Gorka points this out. The other day I had the chance to watch him on the Five lay Juan Williams out, after Williams put forth the current liberal mantra that the shooter was a closet gay man striking out against Christian bigotry. At Gorka’s website he has this quote. Gorka trains FBI and other government personnel on the manners and motives of Islam.

“What I have been trying to convince this city of for many years now is that we have not even begun to engage in the information operations battlefield. We do almost everything at the tactical level and have allowed political correctness to infect the way we do Information Operations and Psychological Warfare. America is preeminent at the application of kinetic force. The U.S. Abbottabad raid will be taught from the Beijing Military Academy to Sandhurst for the next hundred years as how you do a kinetic application of lead-on target. But tactical perfection does not automatically add up to victory. Tactical victories do not necessarily bring strategic success. We must delegitimize the ideology of the enemy or this will be exercise in “whack-a-mole.” Your children, my grandchildren, will be hunting jihadists a hundred years from now unless we take down their ideology of Global Jihadism.” Testimony to House Armed Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, 8 Jan 2016

Gorka is right.  Regardless who the next President or what his (or her God help us) theory or opinion is, we’ll be fighting this war. Because it is a war between civilizations, and our side is to afraid or corrupted to own up to it.






Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Andrew McCarthy points out what Obama wants you NOT to know. It is in fact Islam.

Or more perfectly- Sharia– the law of Islam.

There are various ways to interpret Islamic scripture in order to attempt to evolve it out of violence. This, of course, does not change the fact that supremacist, fundamentalist Islam is a legitimate, mainstream, virulently anti-Western interpretation of Islam; but it does at least mean that there can be other mainstream versions of Islam that reject violence and Islam’s politico-legal system.

Sharia, on the other hand, is basically set in stone. (Or should I say “stoning”?) Even most Islamic reformers acknowledge that it badly needs reform — not that it can be reinterpreted, but that it needs to be changed. Its provisions and especially its draconian punishments were largely fixed a millennium ago. The mandate that homosexuals be killed is not from ISIS or al-Qaeda. It is from sharia — which draws on Muslim scripture.

Better put, the Jews have the Ten Commandments.  In which NO penalty for violations is assessed that ends up with the offender being stoned to death or thrown from a building or set on fire or…

The Christians have rules too, on top of the Jewish basic ten, the biggest is “love that brother as they self”.  Which by design, does not offer death as a option if you violate the rule.

However, Islam…that’s a different kettle of toxic fish.

McCarthy offers a few examples.  For anyone reading this post, read McCarthy (and others) work on this.  You need to be educated on what your enemy is really all about, and looking to Obama or Hillary or really any democrat to tell you is a waste of time.

As I’ve observed several times, an English version of the classic sharia manual Reliance of the Traveller has been endorsed by scholars of al-Azhar University, the seat of Sunni Islamic learning since the tenth century; by the International Institute of Islamic Thought, a Muslim Brotherhood think tank that is influential in Washington; and by other influential Islamic governments and commentators. Here is its teaching on homosexuality, found in the chapter on “Enormities” — the most grave offenses:

Sec. p17.0: SODOMY AND LESBIANISM Sec. p17.1: In more than one place in the Holy Koran, Allah recounts to us the story of Lot’s people, and how He destroyed them for their wicked practice. There is consensus among both Muslims and the followers of all other religions that sodomy is an enormity. It is even viler and uglier than adultery [AM: which is punished brutally, including by death]. Sec. p17.2: Allah Most High says: “Do you approach the males of humanity, leaving the wives Allah has created for you? But you are a people who transgress” (Koran 26:165-66). Sec. p17.3: The Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said: “Kill the one who sodomizes and the one who lets it be done to him.” “May Allah curse him who does what Lot’s people did.” “Lesbianism by women is adultery between them.”

As I noted many times, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi may be Sunni Islam’s most influential living sharia jurist. Here, as reported by the Middle East Forum, is Qaradawi’s teaching on homosexuality:

We must be aware that in regulating the sexual drive Islam has prohibited not only illicit sexual relations and all what leads to them, but also the sexual deviation known as homosexuality. This perverted act is a reversal of the natural order, a corruption of man’s sexuality, and a crime against the rights of females. (The same applies equally to the case of lesbianism.) The spread of this depraved practice in a society disrupts its natural life pattern and makes those who practice it slaves to their lusts, depriving them of decent taste, decent morals, and a decent manner of living. The story of the people of Prophet Lut (Lot), peace be upon him, as narrated in the Koran should be sufficient for us. Prophet Lut’s people were addicted to this shameless depravity, abandoning natural, pure, lawful relations with women in the pursuit of this unnatural, foul, and illicit practice. That is why their Prophet Lut, peace be on him, told them, “What! Of all creatures, do you approach males and leave the spouses whom your Lord has created for you? Indeed, you are people transgressing (all limits)!” (Koran, 26: 165–166) The strangest expression of these peoples’ perversity of nature, lack of guidance, depravity of morals, and aberration of taste was their attitude toward the guests of Prophet Lut, peace be upon him. [Here follows a digression on the story of Lot as related in the Koran. —Eds.] Muslim jurists have held differing opinions concerning the punishment for this abominable practice. Should it be the same as the punishment for fornication, or should both the active and passive participants be put to death? While such punishments may seem cruel, they have been suggested to maintain the purity of the Islamic society and to keep it clean of perverted elements.

Since the American invasion of Iraq in 2003, there has been no shortage of praise for Ayatollah Ali Sistani, whom the Bush administration frequently lauded as a “moderate” and a supporter of “democracy.” (We critics countered that Sistani is a fundamentalist sharia-supremacist who supported “democracy” — meaning popular vote — in a Muslim-majority society because that was the most direct, efficient way to impose sharia.) Sistani is as influential a Shiite sharia authority as there is. As I have previously recounted, when asked, “What is [Islam’s] judgment on sodomy and lesbianism?” Sistani replied: “Forbidden. Those involved in the act should be punished. In fact, sodomites should be killed in the worst manner possible.”

Yup, let it sink in: “killed in the worst manner possible.”

Up until this weekend, I’m betting most gays (and I’ve known many) haven’t spent a whole lot of time pondering why their national leaders they support are importing un-vetted Muslims from a war torn, FUNDAMENTALIST area of the world into the country where they live.  They aren’t really focusing on the reports of mass sexual assaults on women in Europe and those governments siding with the offenders.  They probably dismiss the whole thing as “that’s just politics,” and move on. Tolerance and political correctness have blinded them to the personal threat they face.

Hopefully, not anymore.  They have to realize that no longer can they, as a group, support any political party that seeks to put them in further harm’s way, while denying doing it.

And we are not going to mention the other risks- like diseases such as active tuberculosis- which are being imported with the people Obama (and Hillary) are bringing in and dispersing throughout the nation. Wait till that pandemic time bomb goes off!

Most disturbing is the serial inability of the Obama administration — in this case as after the attacks at Fort Hood and in Boston and San Bernardino — even to name the culprits as radical Islamists. Major Hasan shouts “Allahu akbar!” and Omar Mateen calls 911 in mediis interfectis to boast of his ISIS affiliation — and yet the administration can still not utter the name of the catalyst of their attacks: radical Islam. It is hard to envision any clearer Islamist self-identification, other than name tags and uniforms. The Obama team seems to fear the unwelcome public responses to these repeated terrorist operations rather than seeing them as requisites for changing policies to prevent their recurrence.

On receiving news of the attack, Obama almost immediately called for greater tolerance for the LGBT community — as if American society, rather than jihadism and the cultural homophobia so characteristic of the Middle East, had fueled the attack; or as if Mateen had not phoned in his ISIS affiliation. Obama strained to find vocabulary equivalent to “workplace violence” and was reduced to suggesting that the Orlando club was a nexus for gay solidarity and thus a target of endemic LGBT hatred, a half- but only half-right summation. Why is Obama’s first reaction always to find perceived fault within American society rather than with radical Islamism, an ideology certainly at odds with all progressive notions of gay rights, feminism, and religious tolerance?

Because, as many have suspected, Obama is a sympathizer. (Seriously, his name, his dad, his upbringing ALL should be red flags)   I’m not saying it’s a bad thing, he even boasted his upbringing made him more sensitive to the Muslim worldview. He thought showing up in the Middle East and saying “Hey, I’m the guy who gets it, so let’s all get along” would be all he needed to do.  However, he, like most democrats and theorists, suffered a sharp kick in the nods by reality. His narcissism and need for a legacy prevents him (or Hillary for that matter) from admitting they were wrong.

Trump Claims Nobody Wants Four More Years of Obama, But the Numbers Tell a Different Story

They both “get it”. They just don’t care about you.

We, and that means all of us INCLUDING GAYS, are at war with a fundamentalist religion that seeks to convert, enslave or destroy all those not like it.  And the gay community has just suffered its first serious casualties.  Not the first attack though.

When Brown gave his testimony, he plead not guilty to the killing of Tevlin. Brown explained to prosecutors that he never harmed any women, children or the elderly, so it was a “just kill.”

It turned out not to be the only time that Brown had killed innocent people – or so police authorities believe. The radical Islamist is suspected of killing three gay people in Seattle, Washington, whom he allegedly met using a dating service called “Grindr.”

The murders took place on separate occasions: Brown is suspected of killing Leroy Henderson on April 27th; and both Ahmed Said and Dwone Anderson-Young on June 1st.

This particular jihadist made a point of not killing “righteous” Americans; married men, women or children, but only “useless” Americans- like gays. In his world that made sense.  His world?


Targeted gays because Islam commanded it.

And that is what people have to grasp, it is their WORLD! Unlike many Americans, who go to church on Sunday and try to live a decent life because of a vague memory that if you don’t someday you’ll answer for your sins.  Islam is a set of rules, a way to govern yourself and others.  It is a geo-political system of government that wants to absorb the entire planet- after disposing of those people who cannot be converted. And it is on the march- again! (Take some time researching the historical battles between Christianity and Islam in Europe.)

And Hillary Clinton’s reaction to all of that is to make sure YOU don’t have access to guns to protect yourself from it! Why? Outside she’s a flaming moron, there is this and this, and her, bestie (in a creepy way) Huma, by all accounts a Muslim Brotherhood plant.

In what may be the pinnacle of hypocrisy, moments ago Hillary Clinton, while speaking live on national security and addressing the Orlando shooting took some time from her constant bashing of the Second Amendment and calling for a ban on assault rifles, to say some less than kind words about Saudi Arabia whom it accused of supporting radical organizations. This is what she said:

 The third area that demands attention is preventing radicalization and countering efforts by ISIS and other international terrorist networks to recruit in the United States and Europe. For starters, it is long past time for the Saudis, the Qataris and the Kuwaitis and others to stop their citizens from funding extremist organizations. And they should stop supporting radical schools and mosques around the world that have set too many young people on a path towards extremism. We also have to use all our capabilities to counter jihadist propaganda online. This is something that I spend a lot of time on at the State Department.

There is nothing wrong with that statement, as it is the whole truth – Saudi Arabia’s involvement in supporting terrorism stretches from Sept 11 all the way through to ISIS – however, where there  is a big, and potentially law-breaking,  problem is what Jordan’s official news agency, Petra News Agency, reported on Sunday citing the Saudi crown price, namely that Saudi Arabia is a major funder of Hillary Clinton’s campaign to become the next president of the United States.

As MEE notes, the Petra News Agency published on Sunday what it described as exclusive comments from Saudi Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman which included a claim that Riyadh has provided 20 percent of the total funding to the prospective Democratic candidate’s campaign.

Seriously, why is she even running or getting air time?  Can’t the democrats find someone a little less corrupted? (“Hey Biden, grab your helmet, your going in for Hillary! Grab Liz Warren and let’s suit up!”)

I’m not a Trump fan, God knows I was hoping we’d be smart enough to snag Cruz or Paul or about anyone except Trump. He’s a hot mess. (And Bill Clinton is a political genius.) But even babbling flame-outs are on occasion right about something. And I do not think he’s corrupt in that Saudi bought, elitist mindset, determined to destroy western society sort of way. So given the current choice, I’m going with the guy that will frustrate me, but won’t get me- or anyone I love- killed by letting extremists into the country.

Oh, and by the way, the Left’s obsession with stopping “weapons of war” is just a fools errand. First, there are 300 million “weapons of war” within the US borders now.  All legal, the vast, vast majority owned by law abiding citizens.

Second, if the bad guys can truck over tens of tons of dope into the U.S. you don’t think they cannot truck in AK47’s to give to criminals and terrorists?  Last count, there are nearly 100 million of those weapons on the open market, some going for a hundred bucks.  So all the Left will do is turn law abiding, compliant citizens into felons.  But not stop ONE terror attack.

Which is par for the course for liberals.  A freaking circular firing squad, which demands we all join in the middle. Sorry, I opt out.  I’m done with this whole political “discussion”.  I’m like the guy who realized the day after Pearl Harbor we were at war and it doesn’t matter any longer what the Japanese feel or if they were offended in any way.

Except it was 2001 for me.  We must stop worrying about what others think and if someone or some culture was “offended” and start doing what it takes to stop the threat.  I just don’t care. Not until we are safe again.

The attack on the club in Orlando is just another in a long string of Islamic attacks , throughout the world, many of the victims are Muslims of other sects.  It just is. We know who the enemy is, what they want, where they are at and what kind of threat they offer.


It’s time to stop screwing around.





Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Simply put








Posted in politics | Leave a comment

Hillary says certain people shouldn’t be able to have guns- including her.

I watched as much as I good. Then I put down the sharpened pencil I was thinking of driving into my ears and considered just how bad this person is for our nation.

Of course she wanders around the issue of terrorism, which by the way, she is more than a little responsible. Her “smart power” theory of war and desire to “punch up her resume” destroyed Libya, got four Americans killed and us run out of a country.  Of course now she looks around stunned, acting like she wasn’t even the least involved.  And since her people control the news, as George Orwell warned,

“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.”

She might get away with it, except for this nagging video.

I guess the “we” consists of NATO, Obama and the mouse in her pocket!

Her and Obama’s policies destroyed Libya, destabilized Iraq and Syria and led to the environment that created ISIS.  The same group the shooter pledged loyalty to before killing unarmed, innocent gays in Orlando.

That’s just the hard truth, but don’t let that slow her down. No sir.  She thinks no American  should own “weapons of war” which of course nobody does without a lot of background checks and fees.  But it is catchy.  “Weapons of war.” Hmmm… Like a musket that was used in the first American war for independence? Or, a lever action Henry that was used to defeat the South and reunite the country? Or the old classic bolt action Springfield from WW1 or the M1 Garand from the war that saved the world from Hitler?

Nice phrasing, but a little confusing.

But that’s not the fun part.  The fun part is when she said she believed people on “lists” should lose constitutional rights.  Lists!  Like the no fly list Senator Ted Kennedy found himself on.  We all know Ted was dangerous, but only in a sedan, swilling a bottle of scotch and mostly only to young women.  But…

Then she said “And if you are being investigated by the FBI you certainly shouldn’t  be allowed to get a gun.”  I was just disgusted. Just because the police talk to you should are banned from a constitutional right? Why not the fourth and save all that warrant paperwork! I know Tommy J and the boys back in 1790’s may disagree, but just remember, she and her people are just sooo much smarter.  Man, frustrating…

Then a friend pointed out “Does that mean her?” And I fell over laughing.

Hillary just took away one of her OWN constitutional rights.  She’s under investigation, and somebody should ask her exactly that question. If she’s cleared, is she still on a list?

I meant “those OTHER people, not me!”

Unless of course George Orwell intrudes again.

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”

Trump should jump all over this and make her look weak. She is PART of the problem.  I’m not a Trump fan by any means, but HER as President is nightmarish.  We need someone who has a fresh outlook take the reigns away from those “smart” people.

Their leadership was figuratively killing us, now it is literally killing the most peaceful among us.

Update: she also made reference to making the Saudi leadership do something about other Saudis (not them of course) funding terrorism.  She is soooooo corrupt!

In what may be the pinnacle of hypocrisy, moments ago Hillary Clinton, while speaking live on national security and addressing the Orlando shooting took some time from her constant bashing of the Second Amendment and calling for a ban on assault rifles, to say some less than kind words about Saudi Arabia whom it accused of supporting radical organizations. This is what she said:

 The third area that demands attention is preventing radicalization and countering efforts by ISIS and other international terrorist networks to recruit in the United States and Europe. For starters, it is long past time for the Saudis, the Qataris and the Kuwaitis and others to stop their citizens from funding extremist organizations. And they should stop supporting radical schools and mosques around the world that have set too many young people on a path towards extremism. We also have to use all our capabilities to counter jihadist propaganda online. This is something that I spend a lot of time on at the State Department.

There is nothing wrong with that statement, as it is the whole truth – Saudi Arabia’s involvement in supporting terrorism stretches from Sept 11 all the way through to ISIS – however, where there  is a big, and potentially law-breaking,  problem is what Jordan’s official news agency, Petra News Agency, reported on Sunday citing the Saudi crown price, namely that Saudi Arabia is a major funder of Hillary Clinton’s campaign to become the next president of the United States.

As MEE notes, the Petra News Agency published on Sunday what it described as exclusive comments from Saudi Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman which included a claim that Riyadh has provided 20 percent of the total funding to the prospective Democratic candidate’s campaign.

You can’t make it up.  Just can’t.








Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Guns are like boats. The unhealthy fixation of the progressive liberal on firearms as the evil they fear

At some point in an argument with a liberal about the reality of the world, you realize you are either talking with an insane person or a liar, or both.

In Orlando madness took the stage in a gay nightclub that had been featuring harmless and entertaining stage acts.  Immediately, the usual suspects began to surface on the Left controlled media and political environment.  Even before the facts were released we get the
typical “the white guy did it” meme from at least one foolish commentator.

Then we get the President mumbling past the obvious culprit in order to blame the access to firearms, military types of firearms (please, by all means define that), even though it was military type firearms that stop the threat as well.

It got me thinking about history.  If the tool is the culprit, then we should outlaw boats.  Boats are what brought slaves to America Mr. President.  So it must have been boats which were the culprits in the slave market.  Right?  So if Lincoln had burnt all the boats he had, the war and slavery, would have been stopped.

But wait. It was the same boats that also allowed the Northern forces to blockade Confederate ports helping starve out the supply line and end the war between the states.  So maybe boats aren’t so bad? Maybe?

Or, maybe, once again, we admit that boats and weapons are tools.  Just inanimate objects that in the hands of good guys are put to good use, and in the hands of bad guys can do great harm.  Really, it’s simple. Really, a “follow the bouncing ball moment here” simple.

In Florida, it is against the law to carry your CCW firearm into a bar.  That is the law, passed by politicians in hopes to avoid what they feared would be drunken shootouts- because they watch movies and such- and think everything ends in gunplay.  But I digress. The law says no guns in bars.  Except the jihadist that night broke that law and killed people who followed that law.  THAT should be something we focus on. Not the gun, or access to the gun.

And here is why. In Europe, where guns are nearly banned from ownership by law abiding citizens, the bad guys- i.e. common criminals, organized crime members and terrorists- have FAR more guns than they know what to do with. In fact, in Europe BECAUSE of the foolish mindset of the society there, even the police are outgunned! There was a recent article where our own SOCOM asked if any American gun manufacturer would want to make AK47s.  In reaction, the first question the makers asked was pricing.  Why? Because they cannot compete with the international supply or the cheap manufacturing of the weapon by other nations.  In the article it says this-

The AK-47 was designed to be produced quickly and cheaply. Between 70 million to 150 million of the weapons are in use around the world, said Aaron Karp, a senior lecturer at Old Dominion University in Virginia and senior consultant with the Small Arms Survey, a nonprofit organization that monitors the international arms business.

Estimates of the global count of other weapons in the SOCom solicitation are virtually impossible to make, Karp said.

The economics might make it hard for SOCom to find U.S. manufacturers who are interested in producing the weapons, Karp said. In a major small arms purchase during President George W. Bush’s administration, for example, foreign-made weapons like AK-47s were going for just $100 apiece.

Greg Frazee, CEO of the Tampa-based Trident Arms, agreed there would be a number of hurdles for U.S. manufacturers in trying to provide the weapons as cheaply as they’re available from manufacturers in Russia, China, Bulgaria and elsewhere.

“It is cheaper to lay hands on a couple containers of foreign AK-47s from overseas than manufacturing them and then exporting them,” Frazee said.

Talk about trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube moment when the Left- Obama et. al.- say they want to stop the possession of military type weapons by citizens in order to fight crime.  Ah, yeah…not happening any century soon!

Mindset is the key here. In the Charlie Hebdo attacks, there is video of ARMED Islamic terrorists stalking down and killing an unarmed police officer.  The frustrating irony of that scene is the officer had chosen not to arm himself that day because he didn’t think he needed it. Boy, was he wrong.  That day, the terrorists armed themselves because they had a goal. On the same day, the police officer, under pressure from his LIBERAL society, did not.  And he died for his foolishness. That is the reality we live in.

Recently, a person who should know better argued that it wasn’t Islamic terrorism but just another nut that got those poor people killed in Orlando.  This person is a Barack Obama supporter and now  Hillary supporter and actually implied the real culprit in this was Donald Trump.  As everyone knows, I’m no fan of Trump.  But to blame him for this is like blaming some elderly woman on a farm in Iowa in 1941 for Pearl Harbor!  For the love of God!  At what point do we just throw up our hands and call for the guys in the white coats and butterfly nets to come and just sweep up all the liberal crazies in this nation!

And here’s the real tragedy, as highlighted by a gay activist and writer over at Breitbart, gays are being sacrificed by the Left in order to achieve another goal- the immigration and infiltration of Muslim fundamentalists into our nation.  Why that’s the goal is a mystery.  We on the Right have our suspicions, none of them good.  But to be a supporter of HRC and Obama on this and be gay at the same time must be a mind blowing experience.

Breitbart Tech editor Milo Yiannopoulos appeared on Breitbart News Sunday with executive chairman Stephen K. Bannon to discuss yesterday’s deadly Islamic terror attack in Orlando, Florida, which left 100 dead or wounded at a gay dance club in the city.

Milo is currently en route to Orlando, Florida to give a college talk on Islam, and the threat it poses to freedom and equality in America. Speaking to Stephen Bannon, Milo outlined his thoughts on America’s “Islam problem.”

“It’s not just about terrorism, it’s not just about Islamism, it’s not about radical Islam, it’s not about political Islam, [or] any of the other euphemistic phrases that the media uses to try to distract attention from the fact that we have an Islam problem” said Milo.

“It is horrifying to me to see the greatest, the deadliest, the bloodiest mass shooting in America’s history being Muslim-on-gay crime. This is what I’ve been writing about for years. The minority wars that the progressive left has put into

“It’s mystifying to me why the progressive left has put Muslims at the top of the victimhood hierarchy … It’s particularly worrying because the Muslims want to kill everyone else on that pyramid. They want to kill the gays, the trannies, the blacks, you name it. They don’t have much respect for women. This is going to be a problem for America for decades to come.”

Mystifying? Maybe.  Or maybe just a sad hard truth that somewhere someone(s) decided that undoing the fabric of the greatest most advanced and civilized societies was a good idea- for them, not us.  And trust me on this. The first victims of this move will be the most trusting and hopeful people in those doomed societies.  I call them “zombie food” because they just don’t realize they are surrounded by a horde of zombies until it is too late.

In Orlando, a gay hating, Muslim “zombie” showed up and killed over fifty innocent men and women- all because they were gay and his religion taught him all gays must die.

Think about that for a minute.  Let it sink in.  And realize that your political leadership is inserting more and more “zombies” into our nation every day, without vetting, without background checks, and with a bias towards only one religion.  The one religion which rewards its followers for killing non-believers.  Like what happened in California and now here in Florida.

Insane, right?  Right?




Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

If group A is being killed by an Obama supported group B, why is group A still supporting him?

Or Hillary for that matter?

Here’s the equation. Gays (group A) support liberal agendas, liberal politicians and Obama and Hillary in particular.  However, part of those agendas is the infiltration of Islamic fundamentalists, through the efforts of the Obama/Clinton administration, into our western society.  The fundamentalists (group B) have a religious imperative to kill all gays  to put them out of the misery- for being gay (the fact the males have sex with little boys appears to be some kind of exemption or caveat, but I digress).

In war, you have to understand your enemy. Often, your enemy is eager to tell you all about himself.  You just have to listen without preconceived ideas from your own culture.  We had trouble grasping the sheer magnitude of both the Nazi and the Japanese atrocities, even though they opening stated their goals for years prior.

Here again, there is a enemy speaking clearly, both by word and deed, who is telling you exactly how your life will be like, and how it will end in their vision of the world.

So, if group B is telling group A it will kill ALL OF GROUP A, no exceptions allowed, why is group A still supporting the political leaders and their party, who are importing the deadly group B member?

Seriously folks, this is about survival.  And yes gays would love the world to be full of unicorns farting fairy dust, but that is not how the world works. The world works like the Islamic terrorists say it does.  Gays need to pay attention and back any candidate that will call a halt to this immigration madness until we get a handle on how to control who comes into our nation.

BTW- for what it’s worth, Obama, being caught between on sacred group killing another sacred liberal group, has blamed the gun- again.

Because he doesn’t care if gays get killed. He’s working 3D chess, fundamentally changing the society gays thought they had worked to make safe for their lifestyles.

But they now must realize they are just lowly pawns.

Update: Milo at Breitbart makes my point.

You want to see a “patriarchy”? Fly to Riyadh or Tehran. In the former, women can’t drive. (Alright, fair enough, they might be on to something there.) In the latter, gays are hanged, often from cranes in public places. ISIS is even more brutal, hurling fags off the roof after ritually humiliating them. In Raqqa you’ll see women and children sold for a few hundred dollars.

These are the attitudes we’re importing by allowing millions of Muslims to settle in western Europe. Sorry if that sounds intolerant, but remember women and gays aren’t just treated like shit by ISIS, but mainstream Muslim culture, too. I can’t remember how many Muslim countries have the death penalty for homosexuality. What is it, ten? Eleven?

We now know that at least one of the Paris terrorists came into Europe posing as a “refugee.” This confirms all the worst fears of progressive commentators who were hoping the political Right was wrong about the security threat mass immigration presented.

But there’s a more general concern for liberal western democracies: it’s not just the jihadis, but the attitudes of ordinary Muslims that are a grave cause for concern, not just for the women being gang-raped in Malmö but homosexuals everywhere in Europe.

So you can accuse me of being “islamophobic” if you want, because no, I don’t want to be shouted at or spat on in the street. Maybe my gayness is standing in the way of a Muslim utopia… but I’m going to be selfish here and say maybe we don’t import all the people who want to murder me.

I’m serious. Gay people are getting stoned to death all the time in the Middle East, and not in the fun way: in the throw-big-rocks-at-your-head-until-you-die way. I don’t mean to be callous, but what are we gaining by letting these people in? Why can’t we help them with overseas aid? Why do they need to come here? Aren’t we just encouraging more of them to risk the trip by throwing our borders open?

Put like that, I hope you can appreciate why I’m considering a move to the US and just what you’re giving up by transforming your societies and turning a blind eye to sharia courts where a woman’s testimony is, legally, worth less than a man’s.

You don’t hear progressives complaining about that sort of thing, of course, because somehow crybully Muslims occupy an even more prestigious position on the Oppression League Tables than women and homos. Why are Left-wingers so ferociously pro-immigration from these fucking awful countries? I really don’t get it.

Neither do I….neither do I.

To ISIS this is an imperative and fun times. To gays, not so much. But they support Clinton?





Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment