The scam investigations of Hillary and Trump give us the sad downfall of the FBI.

Listen, the FBI has been corrupted for a long time. They just pushed the narrative they were the ultimate good guys in a world of bad guys-  “The premier law enforcement agency in the world.”  The trouble with that it is filled with humans and humans are flawed.  What keeps flawed humans from getting too far out of line is a set of standards that the agency demands be followed, and from time to “blood” has to be shed in the form agents and supervisors (and errant directors) being disciplined and removed.

The FBI and federal government demand that of local agencies and often inject themselves and their demands into local policing- all hoity-toity like.  Yet, when THEY get caught lying, obstructing and flat out trying to change the laws to suit their political agenda it is all okay.

Mueller is one of those guys, and he’s in charge of an “investigation” that is really a political hit job.  He can do what he wants, arrest who he wants, ruin who he wants to get to the bottom of…something nobody is sure of and everybody agrees is legal.

The end game is the removal of Trump, either by impeachment or by publicly discrediting him and making his reelection politically impossible. Here’s what I’d be tempted to do if I were President Trump: I’d direct the Justice Department to appoint a special counsel to investigate Iran’s efforts to acquire nuclear weapons, including any Obama-administration collusion in that enterprise. I would make sure to call it a “counterintelligence investigation,” putting no limitations on the special counsel — just as with the investigation that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been unleashed to conduct into Trump “collusion” with Russia. That is, I would not restrict the prosecutor and investigators to digging for specified criminal violations. Or, indeed, any criminal violations. I’d just tell the special counsel, “Have at it” — with unbound authority to scrutinize the negotiations surrounding the eventual Iran nuclear deal (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action).

Would I really expect the special counsel to find that Obama officials conspired with the mullahs to obtain nukes for Tehran? No . . . but hey, as the “Trump collusion with Russia” crowd says, “You never know.” Meantime, under the guise of investigating this highly unlikely “collusion,” I’d want the special counsel to scrutinize closely any variances between what Obama-administration officials were telling Congress and the public about the negotiations and what they were telling the Iranians; to probe any side deals the administration agreed to but failed to disclose to Congress; and to consider whether any laws or policies were violated in such matters as President Obama’s payment of a cash ransom in exchange for American hostages held by Iran. Why would I do this? Well, because I disagree with Obama-administration foreign policy, of course. Under the Mueller “collusion” precedent, it is evidently now American practice to criminalize foreign-policy disputes under the pretext of conducting a counterintelligence investigation. It is difficult to come to any other conclusion based on the guilty plea that Mueller just pried out of Michael Flynn.

Read the whole thing. McCarthy is pissed because Flynn plead guilty for “lying to the FBI” –  another process crime. Flynn is not the Russian agent.  His crime is he dared challenge the Deep State and its desire to keep things the way they are by continuing the long dead “Cold War”.   McCain, Graham, big defense, NATO bureaucrats, the military, and the intelligence community all want to keep getting paid a nice chunk of change by convincing the rest of the world of the threat of Russia.  You can add Manafort to that group.  (Oddly, Tony Podesta is also in that group but seems to be avoiding charges….so can we say favoritism and corruption inside the Mueller investigation?)

Image result for flynn comey mueller pics

The first guy’s crime was he beat the deep state favorite, stopping decades of corruption, The other resisted the deep state’s desire to keep the Cold War going, the last guy is now batshit crazy and texting religious quotes. He committed crimes, yet his pal- Mueller- protects him.  See the pattern yet?

It was said several years ago that Russia is a giant gas station acting like a country (I paraphrase).  If you look at everything they have done, from Eastern Europe to the Middle East, you see one constant- it’s about energy.  Because it is energy that keeps the money coming in. The war in Syria is about creating land corridors between Iran and Syria and Russia to pipe natural gas into Europe.  It’s…all…about…the…money!!

Heck the Uranium One payoffs and corruption is not about taking uranium from us to prevent us from using it, it is about cornering the market on raw uranium, then dumping it back onto the market thus cutting the prices and running off all the other mining companies.  It is about cornering the market so THEY can set the prices down the line!  It’s not about war or bombs, it is about the money!  Which is why Clinton and Obama went along.

The difference between 2017 and say the 1980’s is that we have a million sources of information and people are more willing to say what they know.  This is driving the deep state crazy!  Because now, instead of being able to do their dirty work behind closed doors, they find themselves unable to keep any conspiracy, well a conspiracy.   And me saying this is a huge leap from me a year ago when I DEFENDED Comey for coming out in his statement!  My conspiracy friends were pushing me to convert, I resisted saying that no one and no group of people can be so corrupted as to do all the things my friend were accusing them of.  And in truth, some conspiracies are so crazy they actually HELP the deep state keep the vast majority of people confused.

However, that said, there is definitely a conspiracy going on here.  The establishment does not want Trump to succeed and more does not want a Trump like figure to EVER get in charge again!  They want to pick the Presidents so they can control our information flow and how we live. People like Mueller are on board, Comey is on board, the media is on board, and so is about 99% of the rest of the government.  It is so bad that an agent inside the FBI, who was in charge of the Clinton “investigation” and the Trump investigation, was texting his mistress, who also worked on the cases, how much they hated Trump and liked HRC.  Worse (if it can be worse) the FBI covered up the IG discover and quietly reassigned them and lied to Congress about it.   But now the question is HOW MUCH DAMAGE DID THEY DO??!!

House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes has issued an angry demand to the FBI and Department of Justice to explain why they kept the committee in the dark over the reason Special Counsel Robert Mueller kicked a key supervising FBI agent off the Trump-Russia investigation.

Stories in both the Washington Post and New York Times on Saturday reported that Peter Strzok, who played a key role in the original FBI investigation into the Trump-Russia matter, and then a key role in Mueller’s investigation, and who earlier had played an equally critical role in the FBI’s Hillary Clinton email investigation, was reassigned out of the Mueller office because of anti-Trump texts he exchanged with a top FBI lawyer, Lisa Page, with whom Strzok was having an extramarital affair. Strzok was transferred to the FBI’s human resources office — an obvious demotion — in July.

The Post reported that Strzok and Page exchanged text messages that “expressed anti-Trump sentiments and other comments that appeared to favor Clinton.”

Word of the messages and the affair were news to Nunes, even though the committee had issued a subpoena that covered information about Strzok’s demotion more than three months ago. The committee’s broadly worded subpoena for information related to the so-called Trump dossier went to the FBI and DOJ on Aug. 24. In follow-up conversations on the scope of the subpoena, committee staff told the FBI and DOJ that it included information on the circumstances of Strzok’s reassignment.

On Oct. 11, Nunes met with deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein. In that meeting, Nunes specifically discussed the committee’s request for information about Strzok.

In an Oct. 31 committee staff meeting with the FBI, bureau officials refused a request for information about Strzok.

On Nov. 20, the committee again requested an interview with Strzok. (Three days earlier, on November 17, Strzok met with the Senate Intelligence Committee.)

On Nov. 29, Nunes again spoke to Rosenstein, and again discussed Strzok.

On Dec. 1, the committee again requested to speak with Strzok.

After each occasion, the FBI and DOJ did nothing. Now, in what appears to be an orchestrated leak, both the Post and Times published the reason for Strzok’s demotion, along with concerns that the revelation might help President Trump. “Among federal law enforcement officials, there is great concern that exposure of the texts they exchanged may be used by the president and his defenders to attack the credibility of the Mueller probe and the FBI more broadly,” the Post reported. The Times reported that “the existence of the text messages is likely to fuel claims by Mr. Trump that he is the target of a witch hunt.”

Well, yes. It will be of concern to Trump’s defenders, and to defenders of fair investigations generally, that such an important figure in both the Clinton and Trump probes privately expressed bias. It will be important for investigators — and the public — to see Strzok’s and Page’s texts to assess the extent of the problem. But in any event, Nunes is extremely unhappy — not only with the revelation of bias but with the FBI’s resistance.

“By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress’ constitutional oversight responsibility,” Nunes said in a statement Saturday afternoon. “This is part of a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and obstructing this committee’s oversight work, particularly oversight of their use of the Steele dossier. At this point, these agencies should be investigating themselves.”

To add insult to injury, at just the moment the leaked stories appeared, the Justice Department out of the blue notified Nunes that it would meet some of the committee’s demands for information that it had been refusing for months. That didn’t make the chairman happy, either.

“The DOJ has now expressed — on a Saturday, just hours after the press reports on Strzok’s dismissal appeared — a sudden willingness to comply with some of the committee’s long-standing demands,” Nunes said in the statement. “This attempted 11th-hour accommodation is neither credible nor believable, and in fact is yet another example of the DOJ’s disingenuousness and obstruction.”

Would you blame Trump if he went into the FBI and said, “You’re fired, you’re fired, you’re fired!” until his voice gave out?  How in the hell are we supposed to trust anyone in government anymore?

An example of the bias in the establishment media look no further than CNN- which almost buried the bombshell- and the website (an establishment site) that coddles the agent’s affair with the words.

The agent reportedly exchanged text messages with FBI lawyer Lisa Page, whom he was dating, during the campaign and Clinton investigation that appeared to support the Democratic presidential candidate, people with knowledge of the matter told The Washington Post.

Dating…I’m sure the wife probably has a different opinion on that…

Here’s a question.  If Comey was looking to avoid charging Hillary for any felonies or misdemeanors she or her people did, and he needed a sympathetic FBI agent to do the “interviews” which would be designed NOT to trip her up like it did Flynn, would he pick Strzok? I would.

Victor Davis Hanson asks a question we should all be asking, regardless of your bias- who watches the watchmen?  Imagine if there were no Republicans in Congress. NONE OF THIS would come to light!  Imagine if HRC had won.  Do you think Weinstein would be outed? Or that Comey’s lies or the Fusion GPS scandal would be known?  Even with the Republicans in charge of all three branches the “bureaucracy” is still resisting revealing the truth. How hard is it to say whether or not the FISA court’s warrant affidavit  asking to spy on an opposition party during in an election was based on a Hillary paid for, Fusion GPS created fake dossier which did in fact involve the Russians helping Hillary?  I wrote hundreds and hundreds of warrants during my career.  The FBI has a copy!  Just pull the damn file and look.

(On that subject, IF Mueller pivots to that real Russian collusion and you see Simpson doing a perp walk, then I’ll review my opinion.  Until then…)

What I’m betting is that the FBI know it did and this is all about trying to figure out how not to crash the system with the revelation and also how NOT to go to jail.

The only way the FBI could include what they knew or should have known was bad or fake evidence in the warrant request would be to act really stupid (kind of like HRC).  They could get a Mikey type agent, who will write up anything, and then feed him this report third party by saying, “Agent Smith obtained information verifying that Trump in fact colluded with Russia.”  Since Agent Mikey trusts Agent Smith, he can put that statement in with his affidavit and remove himself from being responsible for lying to the judge.  The problem comes in when someone goes to talk with Agent Smith and HE has to lie and say he verified it.  So, it’s all about hiding Agent Smith (who may go by the name of Strzok?). Because if Agent Smith did lie, then the next question is who told him to lie and then suddenly we may find Lynch or Comey quoting scripture from the upper bunk of a federal pen! Just dreaming, it will never happen.

The best bet here is that Mueller is going after Donald Jr or Kushner.  That way Donald Sr will be forced with the same choice Flynn had, quit or watch his kids go to jail.  Or Trump is so crippled he can’t lead.

(Which is what the Russians really wanted in the first place when they tried to play both sides prior to [by corrupting Hillary] and during [by reaching out to Donald Jr. Which by the way, was set up by Fusion GPS and Hillary as a trap] so that no matter who won, half the nation thinks it got ripped off.

That is quite monstrous if you think about it.   And like Hanson, I think enough is enough and Mueller needs to have his lease pulled on…hard.




Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Democrats are being exposed by their own lack of standards. Progressive activist says Franken should stay.

Only because she believes the Republicans won’t throw any of their guys out.

Kate Harding makes the argument that the Republicans will not throw out their abusers, even though there is a long history of democrats not throwing their guys out and Republicans actually doing it.

We have now reached the point where the progressives, democrats and Hillary have basically lost their sense of reality. Plus, she is right, the new generation of Republicans do not want to play by the old rules, but are adopting the rules the democrats have been using for generations.   That scares her and her little cheating friends.

So the justification for NOT dumping Franken is that someday the Republicans may not dump one of their guys…  Which means she, and her friends, were never serious, it was just politics.  This is my shocked face.

And as she does this, another democrat comes out and basically says don’t worry about doing opposition research on me, I’m a dog.

Image result for Democrat Bill O’Neill

A judge and a dog.

An Ohio Supreme Court justice who recently declared his intention to run for governor faced widespread condemnation — and even some calls to resign — after he boasted about his sexual history while defending “heterosexual males.”

Justice William O’Neill posted a statement Friday morning on Facebook about what he described as the “national feeding frenzy about sexual indiscretions,” and in doing so disclosed details about his sexual history.

“As a candidate for Governor let me save my opponents some research time,” O’Neill wrote. “In the last fifty years I was sexually intimate with approximately 50 very attractive females. It ranged from a gorgeous blonde who was my first true love and we made passionate love in the hayloft of her parents barn and ended with a drop dead gorgeous red head from Cleveland.

“Now can we get back to discussing legalizing marijuana and opening the state hospital network to combat the opioid crisis.”

Amid a storm of bipartisan condemnation from Ohio politicians and the chief justice of the state’s supreme court, the post was deleted Friday afternoon.


Shortly before 6 p.m., O’Neill posted new comments on Facebook.

“As an aside for all you sanctimonious judges who are demanding my resignation, hear this. I was a civil right lawyer actively prosecuting sexual harassment cases on behalf of the Attorney General’s Office before Anita Hill and before you were born,” O’Neill wrote.

I actually get where he is coming from. His problem of course will be that some of the women he slept with over the years are going to be subordinates.  That is prima facie evidence of sexual harassment- even if it wasn’t.  He can’t win in this environment and he knows it. So he just stuck his heterosexual finger in the eye of this maddening purge.

Good for him.

But of course he’s out. Because that is what this is all about.  Women are going to be jumping on this opportunity to “fix” past real and imagined offenses.  The ultimate goal for them is to take out Trump while crushing abuse of women forever.  What they do not get is he’s already been vetted and the people voted for him anyway. Which means as they are throwing these grenades of outrage, he’s the only guy wearing a ballistic vest. And the crushing, like all purges, will go too far and hurt decent people of all types.

But what O’Neill is complaining about is legit.  Women and their blind supporters are being used to punish all kinds of offenders, good and bad, legitimate and maybe not so.  It doesn’t matter now because the blood is in the water.  Judge O’Neill thought he could be a good solid liberal and run for governor.  Now he knows that there is a new 2017 angry woman standard and he won’t clear the bar.

In fact, if people take a moment to think very few people will clear the bar because the new way of dealing with people of the opposite sex was not “normal” even ten years ago.  Worse, the fear of losing your job because your bosses are threatened with loss of business until they off load you is stifling and freezes men in place. Women may think that is a good thing, but they will soon realize what they think will happen will not be what will happen.

Over at PJMedia one wife and mother voices her very real fears.  She has some good points.

…It should disquiet you that this tenet of our belief system is being overwhelmed by Gloria Allred and her gaggle of female accusers that she drags out every election cycle. We’ve all heard the term “trial by public opinion,” but until now that still didn’t trump the actual trial in a courtroom. What’s happening to Roy Moore is now becoming commonplace in American politics. A man is being destroyed based on rumors and accusations. There is no judge, no jury, and no justice.

How many husbands out there have had “closed door meetings” with women they work with because of sensitive topics like performance reviews or otherwise? If any one of those women decides she doesn’t like the notes on her job performance, what’s stopping them from leveling accusations against him that can’t be proven, like Moore’s accusers? What will stop them from destroying your family next? We used to be a country that demanded proof. Hearsay is not proof. …

The message is clear. Your husbands and sons are not safe from Gloria Allred and her attack squads should they rise too high. She can and will destroy them with a bevy of trailer park hounds just looking for their next payday. No one cares about the men involved or what the accusations will do to their families and lives as long as Gloria Allred and the Democrats come out on top. Is this really the future we want for the men in our lives? If not, it’s time to insist that we revert to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law. If Moore accusers want justice, then they should press charges and go to court. I would support them 100 percent in that effort. But accusing people on camera with no legal recourse for the accused ought to be illegal. ..

Another female author said the real tragedy here is that men are becoming isolated from touch.  Men are humans, humans need physical contact to feel connected.  But a lot of today’s men refuse to hug or touch or do anything to a woman for fear of being destroyed and hesitate touching or hugging their own kids for fear of being thought a molester.  (How many times have we seen that with families who are just being close. Social media is a monster!)  On the other hand, after watching a Joe Biden clip of his “hands on” approach they may be onto something!  Eeecckk!

What women don’t get is nothing is worse than a man who has no sense of intimacy or connection.  If they cannot relate to human interaction they will be bad at it, and the cycle of misdeeds and mistrust will only escalate.  One has to only look into some subcultures in this country and in the world where men are separated from women, have a lack empathy and intimacy for women, and how those women suffer for it.

There is a moment in a society where men are stripped of their masculinity.  When you see that happen, like certain nations in Europe, you can be guaranteed that disaster will follow.  Women do not understand that evil and violence do not respect PC or feminism or  this current purge of sexual harassment.

As we see in Europe the “woke” men stand aside as the lesser males from less “woke” cultures attack, rape and kill their women.  And when men do stand up, they are ridiculed and forced to stand down. They called anti-immigrant and called Nazis or white supremacists (which could have some truth to it) because they demand the retention of their established culture- which by the way- protects women. But as screwed up as they are, it appears their goal is to retake the ground lost by effeminate PC following eunuchs who seem hellbent on killing off their world.

Image result for jeremy corbyn pro immigration

This being one of the suicidal eunuchs.

Worse, men need to have a purpose to offload their instinctive aggressiveness. There is a hundred thousand years of genetic imprinting that make men who they are.  Fifty  years of Gloria Steinmen types isn’t going to unwind that.

Here is an example of what a conflict between three cultures looks like. The first culture is the dismissive of women black thug culture. The second is the woman’s “I have a right to my space, damn the reality of the situation!” culture. And lastly, the man culture.

Note the one culture demeaned the other and beat it. The beaten culture had to have the man culture, the culture the woman despises, come to her rescue.  Also notice the eunuch culture, which I’m sure was on the train to, was nowhere to be seen. By the way, the woman continued to mouth the thug AFTER the big man showed up.  The ” My boyfriend’s here! Oh you are gonna get it now buddy! ” moment.   In truth, no man shows up, that black thug was getting himself worked up and justified to beat her some more.

Here is another video. Note the eunuch reporter saying the passengers who beat a man who tracked down and attacked a mother in front of her kids “went too far.”  Please explain how?  Even after the police showed up the man was still fighting. If he is fighting, he gets beat.

The bottom line is men need to feel wanted and have a purpose.  Alienate them from either and you end up with third world type behavior. More ISIS than John Wayne, if you will.

Like I said, as this purge works it way out, some of it much needed, the risk of allowing the truly vengeful and angry feminists to drive it too far is real. And the outcome is just as bad.

Imagine a world where thugs who don’t respect women just attack them and the good men just stand by because they were told they weren’t needed anymore  because they are too rough  and infected with toxic masculinity.   Or just look at Europe..









Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

My hunch was right. It was a forgery and Allred blows up the GOP’s Roy Moore destruction effort.

There are a lot of moving parts here.  One of which is comparing Alabama’s 1979 culture to today’s 2017 PC feminist culture.  Another is the obvious attempt by the GOP not to seat a firebrand like Moore because of his past positions that rub against the establishment standards. Things like God first, ten commandments should be in public places, abortion is a crime, transgenders do not have special rights, etc.  Moore is definitely out on the one side of many arguments that the secularists felt they had managed to win. So letting him anywhere near a Senatorial microphone was scaring them all to death.

Worse for them, Moore would be the guy who will get inside their corrupt playhouse and burn it to the ground for funsies. Imagine him in the well of the Senate lambasting them for their corrupt little deals; like the Senate ethics committee, which never expels anyone, or the secret slush fund of taxpayer money that pays off dozens of sexual complaints for over fifteen million dollars. (Hang on, that’s going to be fun!)

During this coming out of unverifiable complaints of Moore’s sexual assault on a fourteen year old or a sixteen year old waitress conflated along with his attempt at dating younger women (a cultural thing back in 1979 Alabama), Gloria Allred decided to get involved and promptly screwed Mitch McConnell’s pooch.  She trotted out a woman who claimed that she was assaulted in a parking lot by Moore back in 1977.  To prove that she knew Moore, she pulled out a yearbook with is comment about how beautiful she was and then a signed signature by Moore that was dated and had a location.

Immediately two camps were created. The “See See! Moore’s a perv!” camp, occupied by old dog Republicans like McConnell and McCain, liberals and feminists and the media.  And the second camp who believed if Allred was involved something stinky was up.  I’m going to use Breitbart as the sources only because CNN and the Times are refusing to do their work- again- and check out the stories.  They hate Moore as much as McConnell does.

Immediately people who doubted the story found the signature weird. First, no one signs a yearbook with a date and a place where the girl claimed she worked in 1977.  Second, no signature is the same over forty years, it looked fake. Third, the signature was in two colors of ink. Fourth, and something Moore pointed out, he was not the District Attorney, but a deputy DA, so the “DA” next to the signature was not that reference.

I also threw the bullshit flag immediately.  This was far too convenient.  The next day or so, it was reported that Moore recognized the “DA” as that of his assistant’s initials while he was a judge.  It was her habit to initial his STAMPED signature on court filings.  Then it was revealed that the “victim”, Beverly Nelson, had appeared before him in court on a divorce in 1991. Which meant that she had a copy of his signature AND the “DA” on the right side- which is exactly what appeared in the yearbook.  Moore screamed fake!

In our interview, Moore spotlighted the initials “D.A.,” linking it to a signature on Nelson’s 1999 divorce document over two decades later. That signature was followed by the initials of his former assistant, Delbra Adams, who only started working for him in 1987.

At the press conference with Allred, Nelson failed to mention the divorce case entirely and that Moore was the judge whose stamped signature appears on her 1999 divorce document. And alongside Moore’s signature are the initials “D.A.” for Delbra Adams, Roy Moore’s former longtime secretary and judicial assistant.

Breitbart News caught up with Adams yesterday, and she confirmed in an interview that the initials on Nelson’s divorce document were indeed hers. Adams explained it is normal procedure for a clerk or assistant to initial a stamped signature on a legal document to verify that the stamp is authentic.

“In their press statement they said that this Nelson woman had no contact with me” since 1977, Moore said in our radio interview. “But in actuality, we found that she had a divorce case. I signed the document. My secretary stamped the document and then put her initials out on the end of the line.”

Moore continued: “When they forged the name onto this manual, they also included the initials of my receptionist, my secretary. Which were D.A. Delbra Adams. And certainly they forged it and this is a complete fabrication. I did not know Nelson and had never met her and still do not know her.”

Allred and Nelson have claimed that the “D.A.” at the end of the yearbook signature stand for “district attorney” even though at the time Moore was a deputy district attorney.

On Wednesday, an attorney for Moore sent an official letter giving Allred forty-eight hours to release the yearbook to an independent examiner and to take steps to ensure the “immediate and professional preservation of the yearbook.”

Allred has done a series of news media interviews in which she has made clear her refusal to release the yearbook to any entity other than a Senate committee. This even though Moore is not yet a senator, so such an ethics committee cannot be formed. And despite the yearbook inscription playing a central role in the campaign for a U.S. senate seat.

Allred has further admitted that she had not asked Nelson whether she actually saw Moore sign her yearbook.

Allred is already on the hook for some misdeeds as an attorney and has a habit of trotting out offended women to harass men and threatening lawsuits.

This is the yearbook signature.  Look at the similarities.

Where this gets interesting is the fact that the New York/California/DC culture is at war with the places like Alabama and its more rural and genteel manner. I said in many posts there is no way some haughty DC reporter is going to show up in Alabama and find four separate women claiming Moore dated them in the seventies.  First of all, they won’t talk to the reporter UNLESS cash is involved.  Second, only one, prior to the fake complaint by Allred, claimed assault, the rest said they had a kiss and a handshake date and he moved on.  Back then, an older man looking to start a family would be stuck with dating women younger than him. The tradition was that when a girl graduated high school she either went to college or got married. There were no millennials hanging around the house until they were thirty!  It was “Love you girl, but you gotta get out of the nest and make your own way. Find a good man, start a family, come by at Christmas!”

By today’s standards that almost sounds abusive.  But that was Alabama back then.  Moore was just in the middle of it and yes it was a little creepy to see him chasing teenagers.  But any older women were married or divorced and had baggage.  Moore eventually married, at thirty-eight years of age, a woman who was twenty-three. That woman was already a widow and had a child.  Think about that, twenty-three and a widow with child. They are still together and have a huge family- which the Left and McConnell are trying to destroy just to keep the man out of national politics.

Does McConnell care?  Nope.  The feminists? Nope.  The Left in general? Nope.  So things are looking pretty bleak, except that the Democrat candidate is the textbook pro partial birth abortion, free stuff, anti-church liberal.  And in Alabama, that just doesn’t play.  I read a number of posts where the people were saying, “Look that was a long time ago in a different era and maybe Moore did some things that were wrong, but he doesn’t support killing babies today, sooo….”  Or the “Listen, my grandpappy married grandma when she was fourteen. They stayed together for sixty years. So what is the big deal here? You making fun of us?”

But let’s get back to Allred, who is now just a freaking  train wreck of a human.  She has suddenly started playing the part of an incompetent attorney.  She now says she never ASKED her client if she saw him sign it or if it was a forgery!!!!  Why? Because when the lawsuit falls on both of them, she can skate out from under by playing dumb, leaving that stupid, greedy, lying (according to her step-son) woman holding the bag.  Plus she says there has to be a Senate hearing where she can turn over the book.  Now, EVERYBODY with a brain knows the Senate has no jurisdiction over a candidate running for the office. There will be no hearing.  So, again, liar.


So what is this all about?  The Senate uni-party, under McConnell, tried to seat a “good ol’ boy” corrupt politician in Strange.  Alabama, like most of America, is now onto the game and refused, sending Moore to the general.  McConnell and the rest started undermining Moore in a scripted play.  Accusations were discovered that no Washington Post reporter could find.  So they had inside help either by the Strange campaign or by the Dems.  Either way, Moore is accused, McConnell (et al) are horrified and pulled their support and money.  Fake polls are created by the REPUBLICANS to dissuade Moore from staying in the race and all things were going well UNTIL Allred showed up and screwed McConnell’s pooch.

Of course it hasn’t helped that Al Franken is photographed feeling up a beautiful woman while she slept, along with a number of other outlandish actions.  (Speaking of not being of character to be in the Senate!)

And it didn’t help that during this feminist purge of all things offensive done by men to women, somebody pointed out the seventeen million dollar slush fund that Congress has in order to settle sexual harassment complaints- in secret.

Suddenly, Moore’s not the issue anymore. It’s far bigger and McConnell has learned the lesson everyone who owns a rabid dog learns.  Once off the leash there is no guarantee it isn’t going to turn and bite you.

Don’t get me wrong. McConnell and the Left would be more than willing to sacrifice one Al Franken and an old Clinton for one Moore and a Trump.  But will it stop there?


Image result for Man getting dog bit

McConnell’s dilemma. Does he take the bite or call it off?

Oh, by the way, Judicial Watch is sending over a FOIA to get the names and details on those Congressmen.

As Scobby Do said, “Rut Ro!”











Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Roy Moore vs. the Swamp. The ends justify the means- Republican style

I see this report about the “sexual advances” by Judge Roy Moore some forty years ago, authored by the Washington Post, and I’m struck by how dumb those in charge, and worried about their power, think we are!

It’s over…O-V-E-R!!  We know now. We know they lie and cheat and steal and compromise and do whatever they can to keep power.  Mueller knows it- because he is part of it, everybody in Washington knows it, the media- on both sides- knows it (and hides it) and America knows it.

The Fusion GPS fake dossier, paid for by the Hillary campaign and the Russians is going to melt through DC like a radioactive core in a runaway power plant!  Because of that, the cover has been ripped off and expect for the diehard CNN types, everybody now knows those in power will do anything to keep it.

Here, we have the Washington Post managing to go a state and find four women, claiming without help, that says forty years ago Moore was grabby.  I’ve spent time in Alabama for years.  There is no way a Yankee reporter from the Washington Post, the center of the swamp, would be able to land in a state he probably couldn’t pick out on a map of the country and have Southern men or women spill their generation old secrets and gossip.  It took me ten years to be “accepted” as one of them, and all I was doing was hunting and camping!  A squirrelly arrogant reporter who HATES everything that Alabama stands for cannot find this story without a lot of help. Mark Levin asks the obvious questions.

 Mark asked his audience: How did the WaPo know there were four women, who they were, and how to contact them?… A Washington Post reporter just happens to be in Alabama talking to Roy Moore supporters… And he happens to hear what no one has reported in 38 years, no political opponents – No one… That Roy Moore, 38 years ago, made advances to teenage girls. Four of them. Now, the four girls do not know each other, they have never met. Yet the person who the Post reporter happened to run into and speak to, the person who supposedly told the reporter the story about the four girls, happened to know all four girls and how to contact them?


Trump’s unlikely victory has exposed the generations long corruption that is DC.  They are getting sloppy and desperate because their time at the federal trough, eating the taxpayer’s money like fat pigs, is over.  The establishment is so desperate they banded together to try and unseat several candidates that threatens their way of life.  One of them was Trump- and they failed. Another is Roy Moore, a true firebrand of a human, who has several ethical standards that will not fit in the world of McConnell and Graham and McCain.

Image result for photo of Moore and McConnell and McCain

These are not good guys. They serve themselves before all others.

The story is bogus.  The fact the Post conflated stories so make Moore look worse under today’s standards shows they are working with thin gruel.  Back in 1979 the Alabama culture was different than today. A man dating a 19yr old woman was not unusual.   If the family approved it was okay.  So even if Moore did date a younger woman, then so what? Especially if the “dates” were a couple of kisses and handshake.  However, the Post is trying to lump in Moore with Weinstein, et al by clumping the normal dates with the one accusation.   Now we find that the women involved- claimed as being non-partisan, were in fact supporters of the other side, or maybe a little unhinged?


But does that matter? Nope, just like a play with scene one then two then three, the Republicans, who do not want Moore, are spewing their lines and hitting their marks. Now the Senate is pulling their money out of his race, money they didn’t want to spend anyway. And remember, this is over ACCUSATIONS from 40yrs ago.  Some vague accusation now brought up.

Some Senate Republicans have encouraged Mr. Strange — who lost to Mr. Moore in a bitterly contested Republican runoff election in September — to run as a write-in candidate, an option Mr. Strange is considering, according to Republicans who have spoken with him. But some Republicans believe he would do little more than play spoiler, ensuring either that Mr. Moore is elected by taking votes Mr. Jones would otherwise get or that the Democrat wins by siphoning support from Mr. Moore among Republicans seeking a palatable third option.

Mr. McConnell and Senator Cory Gardner of Colorado, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, spoke with Mr. Strange about the prospect immediately after the Moore news broke on Thursday, according to Republicans familiar with the conversation. And Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who won re-election in 2010 as a write-in candidate, was planning to discuss logistics with Mr. Strange this weekend.

Asked Friday if he thought Mr. Strange should run as a write-in candidate, Mr. McConnell said only that “you’d have to ask Luther what his intentions are, given this development.”

John McCain is screaming the mere accusation is enough.  However, if he could remember back in 2008 he was accused of screwing a lobbyist. Yet, HE didn’t quit….so…?

Also, remember it was McCain who sent an aide to Europe to get the false dossier and then gave it to Comey to “force” Comey to use it as evidence- which is now the suspected linchpin to Mueller’s investigation. Soooo…. what is that old saying “What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive. ”

This is a game.  It’s a game run by people who will follow the progressive mantra “The end justifies the means.” in order to stay in power.  What they do not want is a loose cannon like Moore, a man known to demand ethical boundaries, anywhere near their little playhouse.  He is a man with a match and they don’t want it burned down.

If I were in Alabama now, I would vote for Moore- twice! Just to make sure the man with the match will end up inside McConnell’s playhouse.  Then see what happens.




Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The war to undermine the nation is started. Stop believing otherwise. Texas, Kentucky, Virginia.

Enough, simply enough.  We have tolerated bad behavior long enough.  This is America and it is under assault from a hundred different directions.  But all of those assaults can be sourced from two locations; the Progressive Left who has worked to undermine faith, education and politics, and the spoiled corrupt politicians who are willing to let that happen as long as they get paid or rewarded.  Yes, Chuck, Nancy, Barak, Frederica, et al.  I am talking to you.  This game you are playing isn’t a game for the victims, just ask your colleagues Scalise and Paul and the poor people in Texas.

Image result for shooting in texas church

Victims of the hatred from the Left. Enough putting up with it.

The man responsible for attacking Sen. Rand Paul Friday afternoon was an avowed liberal who frequently fought with his neighbors about politics, according to a report Sunday from The Washington Post.

Local citizens say Rene Boucher, the 59-year-old man who assaulted Paul, was a socialist who frequently fought with neighbors about health care policies and other liberal issues. Boucher and Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, are on the opposite end of the political spectrum, they told reporters.

Jeff Jones, a registered nurse who worked with Boucher at the Bowling Green Medical Center, described Paul’s attacker’s politics as “liberal.”

“He was active on social media and said some negative things about the Republican agenda,” Jones said of Boucher, a Bowling Green, S.C., citizen who lives in the same gated community as Paul. “I think it was unfortunate that they lived so close together.”

Boucher is a divorced socialist who is “pretty much the opposite of Rand Paul in every way,” Jim Bullington, a former member of the city commission who knows both men well, told reporters Sunday.

Remember, it was the same type of guy who thought killing Republicans (including Rand Paul) at a baseball practice was the proper thing to do.  History is FULL OF EXAMPLES of socialists and anarchists killing people for the “cause.” (Side note to Paul – GET a GUN Dude!)

In Texas

A church shooting in Sutherland Texas was stopped after a local gun owner grabbed his rifle and began returning fire at the shooter, police announced Sunday.

Police say the shooter, who has been identified as 26-year-old Devin P. Kelley of New Braunfels, Texas, walked inside the church and opened fire just before 11:30 a.m. local time. Kelly killed at least 26 people before an unidentified gun owner forced him to flee by grabbing his own rifle and returning fire, Texas Rangers announced Sunday.

“At approximately 11:20 this morning a suspect was seen at a Valero gas station in Sutherland Springs, Texas,” Police Maj. Freeman Martin told reporters. “He was dressed in all black. That suspect crossed the street to the church, exited his vehicle and began firing at the church.”

“That suspect then moved to the right side of the church and then continued to fire,” he continued. “That suspect entered the church and continued to fire. As he exited the church, a local resident grabbed his rifle and engaged that suspect. The suspect dropped his rifle, which was a Ruger AR assault-type rifle and fled from the church.”

“Our local citizen pursued the suspect at that time,” Freeman said. “A short time later law enforcement responded that [the] suspect [was] right at the Wilson/Guadalupe County line … and was found deceased in his vehicle. At this time we don’t know if it was a self-inflicted gunshot wound or if he was shot by the local resident. We know he’s deceased in the vehicle. ”

The video of the interview with the driver.  Go Texas.

The point here is the sooner we accept the Left/Progressive movement is at war with America and the vast majority of decent citizens of all colors, races, genders, sexual orientations the quicker those good people will survive the assaults.

Enough with the foolish politics and PC and allowing the Progressives to influence the direction of the nation. And ENOUGH of any politician who would kill his fellow men and women for power and control (Yes Chuckie, Wilson, Nancy and HRC, I am talking to you and your friends.)

Just Enough.  Trump’s election to the Presidency exposed the deep state and its desire to remain in power by splitting our nation apart and keeping us at each other’s throats while far more dangerous elements in the country are committed to actually destroying her.

For that they all deserve eternity in Hell.  But I’ll settle for them being run out of office and shamed…for now.

Protect yourself and your family and your community. This war will not end until WE end it. Start with telling your liberal whiny professional victim friends, all the anti-Trump celebrities like Baldwin and Silverman to Shut The Fuck UP!, and same to the Schumers, Obama’s, Frederica Wilson and the rest of their nation killing gang.

When you vote, for for the sane person who doesn’t hate America’s history.  Who loves their nation.  When  you travel, carry a weapon you are good with and can legally possess.  If a bad guy does a bad thing remember those two men who engaged and killed the shooter five minutes before the first cop showed up.

That is where we are at. We didn’t want it, but it is here.





Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What is true? Whatever belongs to the people in power. Trump dossier vs MLK records.

For years there were rumors that the FBI worked against MLK and planted false information to neuter his power.

Now Trump has decided to release troves of documents, some of which seem to support the idea that the FBI was not acting as a fair and just organization, but rather following the orders of an establishment.

The 20-page document released on Friday attempts to tie the civil rights leader to various communist influences and alleges financial improprieties at the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the African-American civil rights organisation founded by King, reports CNN. The document also contains insinuations and assertions about King’s personal life, including extramarital affairs and other sexual improprieties. However, it was not clear whether the authors of the document verified any of the information.

More from McClatchy:

One of the sections in the document in the section titled “King’s Personal Conduct” mentioned alleged affairs, which were alluded to in the 2014 film “Selma” and an infamous letter from the FBI urging King to commit suicide. The document repeatedly referred to some the alleged sex acts King engaged in as “unnatural” and “abnormal.”

One of the events mentioned in the document are workshops King held in Miami, Florida, in February 1968 with funds from the Ford Foundation to train black ministers in leadership.

“One Negro minister in attendance later expressed his disgust with the behind-the-scene drinking, fornication, and homosexuality that went on at the conference,” the document reads. “Several Negro and white prostitutes were brought in from the Miami area. An all night-sex orgy was held with these prostitutes and some of the delegates in attendance.”

“One room had a large table in it which was filled with whiskey. The two Negro prostitutes were paid $50.00 to put on a sex show for the entertainment of the guests. A variety of sex acts deviating from the normal were observed.”

The document continued to say that such occurrences were well known by King’s acquaintances.

“As early as January, 1964, King engaged in another, two-day drunken sex orgy in Washington, D.C. Many of those present engaged in sexual acts, natural as well as unnatural, for the entertainment of onlookers. When one of the females shied away from engaging in an unnatural act, King and other of the males present discussed how she was to be taught and initiated in this respect,” the document reads. “Throughout the ensuing years and until this date King has continued to carry on his sexual aberrations secretly while holding himself out to the public view as a moral leader of religious conviction.”

According to the document, King had a frequent affair with a woman, which may have led to a baby girl being born. The FBI said the sources of the information was “a prominent Negro who is related by law to King’s mistress,” who referred to King repeatedly as a “hypocrite.”

“It was learned in February, 1968, from a very responsible Los Angeles individual in a position to know, that King has been having an illicit love affair with the wife of a prominent Negro dentist in Los Angeles, California, since 1962. He believes King fathered a baby girl born to this woman inasmuch as her husband is allegedly sterile,” the document reads.

“The child resembles King to a great degree and King contributes to the support of this child. He calls this woman every Wednesday and frequently meets her in various cities throughout the country.” According to the document, the source also said that King had affairs with three other women, including Joan Baez, a folk singer.

“The prominent Negro who furnished the information said he was appalled that a man of King’s low character could cause so much trouble for both Negroes and the Government,” the document reads. “As can be seen from above, it is a fact that King not only regularly indulges in adulterous acts but enjoys the abnormal by engaging in group sexual orgies.”

 The King document was reviewed by the National Archives and Records Administration’s JFK Task Force in 1994 and marked with an “x” for “total denial” of its release. The options “release in full” and “release in part” were left blank on the cover page.

As CNN reports, The FBI analysis questions whether King should have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964. It concludes:

“These facts about the Nobel Peace Prize winner make his remarks seem incongruous when he replied after winning this cherished award, ‘History has thrust me into this position. It would be both immoral and a sign of ingratitude if I did not face my moral responsibility to do what I can in the civil rights struggle.'”

Years later, we have another situation where the FBI is involved in a report that is demonstrably false on its face and may be along the lines of the false reports the FBI generated – by order of the “swamp” –  directed at an challenger to the status quo.

Image result for mlk and trump

Different era. Same lies.

Frankly, if I were an FBI agent, I would be embarrassed.  At what point will a good man or woman inside the system stand up and be counted.  One agent who knows the truth, who smartly kept the emails and records, can stand in front in front of Congress or the public and say “Enough. We are better than this.”

It’s a comfortable bet it ain’t going to be Comey or Mueller or McCabe.  And that’s a sad day.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

They were all in on it! Boy was I wrong. The Russian/FBI/DOJ/HRC/DNC real collusion.

This is now getting play.  Trump stayed on long enough to force the unwinding of the scandal that will make all other scandals pale in comparison. GOOD FOR HIM!

There is dirty politics, and then there is the criminal act of allowing the police to chase an innocent man for your lies.  That is what happened…and they all knew it.

Where I made a mistake was believing that Comey was trying to do the right thing last summer by giving America the “wink, wink, nod, nod, say no more” heads up that electing Hillary would be a HUGE mistake.  Now, it seems he was more trying protect his own self made persona as being “up it all” while doing the bidding of Hillary and Obama. I could see her keeping him on as a reward for being so independent, when all the while he’s just another water boy like his mentor – Mueller.

Mueller was the head of the FBI during the time the Obama/HRC administration (and do not think it was any other way) was engaged in trying to make nice with the Russians.  Part of that was the sale of our uranium, through a cut out Canadian company owned by a friend of Bill Clinton, Frank Giustra, who gave millions to Bill and the Foundation. Then the Russians, who wanted Giustra’s company, gave Bill and the Foundations more millions.

The REAL collusion. They all knew.

You have to suspend your belief that the Clintons have a redeemable character.  They do not, and never have, since their early days in Arkansas when Hillary figured out she could be filthy rich if she traded power and access for cash.  This is just the first swipe at cash for power in the rich (pun intended) Clinton history.  As she said, she wanted a “nest egg” for the future.

I remember running into a couple from Arkansas around the time Bill won the election in the nineties. They were laughing out loud at America. Their knew the Clintons and the Arkansas machine and knew it was coming to America.  Their quote to me was “America has NO IDEA what it just did to itself.”  I kid you not.

Background and Clinton’s trading

Clinton had no experience in such financial instruments.[2] Bill Clinton‘s salary as Arkansas Attorney General and then Governor of Arkansas was modest and Clinton later said she had been interested in building a financial cushion for the future.[3][4] The Clintons’ combined income in 1978 from the governorship and Rose Law Firm amounted to $51,173,[5] equivalent to $187,900 in 2016. James Blair was a friend, lawyer, outside counsel to Tyson Foods, Arkansas’ largest employer, and had been doing so well trading commodities futures that he encouraged friends and family to enter the market too.[6][3][4] Blair in turn traded through, and relied upon cattle markets expertise from, broker Robert L. “Red” Bone of Refco, a former Tyson executive and professional poker player who was a World Series of Poker semifinalist.[4][7] In October 1978, when Bill Clinton was Attorney General and on the verge of being elected Governor,[1] Clinton opened a trading account, although Blair made most of the trades.

By January 1979, Clinton was up $26,000;[4] but later, she would lose $16,000 in a single trade.[4] At one point she owed in excess of $100,000 to Refco as part of covering losses, but no margin calls were made by Refco against her.[4] Near the end of the trading, Blair correctly sold short and gave her a $40,000 gain in one afternoon.[4] In July 1979,[1] once she became pregnant with Chelsea Clinton, “I lost my nerve for gambling [and] walked away from the table $100,000 ahead.”[3] She briefly traded sugar futures contracts and other non-cattle commodities in October 1979, but more conservatively, through Stephens Inc.[4][8] During this period she made about $6,500 in gains (which she failed to pay taxes on at the time, consequently later paying some $14,600 in federal and state tax penalties in the 1990s).[8][9] Once her daughter was born in February 1980, she moved all her commodities gains into U.S. Treasury Bonds.[4]

Media scrutiny

The profits made during the cattle trading first came to public light in a March 18, 1994 report by The New York Times, which had been reviewing the Clintons’ financial records for two months.[7] It coincided with the beginning of congressional hearings over the Whitewater controversy.[10] Clinton initially told aides that she had made the futures gains by studying the financial news and placing trades herself, but later acknowledged the help of Blair. Media pressure continued to build, and on April 22, 1994, she gave an unusual press conference under a portrait of Abraham Lincoln in the State Dining Room of the White House, to address questions on both matters; it was broadcast live by CBS, NBC, ABC, and CNN.[11] In it she said she had done the trading, but often relying upon the advice of Blair, and having him place orders for her; she said she did not believe she had received preferential treatment in the process.[11] She also downplayed the dangers of such trading: “I didn’t think it was that big a risk. [Blair] and the people he was talking with knew what they were doing.”[6]

Likelihood of results

Various publications sought to analyze the likelihood of Clinton’s successful results. Clinton made her money by betting on the short side at a time when cattle prices doubled.[12] The editor of the Journal of Futures Markets said in April 1994, “This is like buying ice skates one day and entering the Olympics a day later. She took some extraordinary risks.”[2] Her activities involved exposure to losses that potentially could have been greater than her family’s net worth if the market had turned sharply against her.[13] The former head of the IRS chief counsel’s Commodities Industry Specialization Team expressed skepticism that a novice trader could make such a return.[14] One analysis performed by Auburn University and published in the Journal of Economics and Finance claimed to find that the odds of a return that large during the period in question were about one in 31 trillion.[15][16][17]

Sure she got lucky..or someone was just using this system to pay off Hillary, who was recognized as the one really running Arkansas.  I think the latter is the truth.  Why didn’t someone come forward and say so?  James and his wife Susan McDougal knew the truth, they were part of this whole mess in Arkansas.  Even though he became a “cooperating witness” it wasn’t without serious pressure and I’m sure he didn’t tell the counsel everything he knew.  Being afraid of the Clintons power structure is a wise thing.  Here is a bit from history. CNN’s story, before CNN went left, lays out just one part of the Clinton corruption.

Payoffs to the governor?

McDougal alleged that in the 1980s, he and a longtime businessman at McDougal’s S&L, Henry Hamilton, “developed a system to pass money to Clinton,” then governor of Arkansas. “I considered it just another way of helping to take care of Bill.

“A contractor agreed to pad my monthly construction bill by $2,000,” McDougal wrote. “The contractor put the figure on his invoice as a cost for gravel or culvert work. After I paid the full amount … the contractor reimbursed me the $2,000. I turned the money over to Henry to give to Clinton.”

Hamilton is dead.

“Once, after I handed Henry his latest consignment of 20 hundred-dollar bills to relay to the governor’s office, he turned the bills over and over in one hand, like a magician,” McDougal said. “Henry grinned. `You know,’ he said, `Caesar had his Brutus, Charles the First had Cromwell. Clinton could profit from these examples if he crosses us.'”

The alleged $2,000-a-month cash payment and other accusations “are simply made up out of whole cloth,” Kendall declared.

McDougal wrote that Hamilton “insisted that under-the-table payments would solidify our connections in state government.” He said Clinton appointed his recommended candidates to state jobs, including state securities commissioner.

Looking out for lover’s interests?

Kendall pointed out that a previous McDougal accusation that turns up again in the book — that Clinton urged Whitewater figure David Hale to make a fraudulent $300,000 loan — was contradicted by McDougal’s own testimony at his 1996 criminal trial.

In the book, McDougal said one of Ms. McDougal’s brothers, Jim Henley, witnessed a meeting in which Clinton allegedly urged Hale to make the fraudulent loan.

McDougal said Clinton appeared unexpectedly at the end of a meeting where the loan was discussed and asked, “Did you discuss Susan’s loan?”

“How did Bill know about Susan’s loan?” McDougal wrote. “Why did he care about the loan?” McDougal said he concluded that Clinton and Ms. McDougal had resumed an affair “and she had asked him to make it clear to David Hale, the man he had appointed judge, that the governor was interested in Susan’s loan application.”

Trust me, this was nothing.  What HRC and Bill did when they won the Presidency in the nineties was bring the Arkansas corruption to a national level. Much like Obama brought “the Chicago way” of political corruption to DC. (Look at the history of Travelgate and Rose law firm investigations to get a feel for what that is. And just how money grubbing Hillary is. She can never have enough.)

The great talent Hillary has is the ability to corrupt everything and everyone around her. It is really something.  If you will note in the articles written today we now know Obama/Holder/Lynch/Comey/Mueller/McCabe/Rosenstein were all neck deep in the cover up of the Russian spy efforts and the Uranium One deal.  That means the people looking into the Russian collusion case against Trump were actually involved in a Russian collusion coverup themselves. All because Obama wanted to “reset” with the Russians, and Hillary wanted to make cash.  Strange bedfellows.

At  this point Mueller has to resign.  He knew and he didn’t say anything, just did the dance because HE would be dirtied up if he told the truth.

His whole unit has to be disbanded and we’ll start over, this time pointed in the right direction, and led by some FBI agent and a career prosecutor with NO ties to DC.  None, nada.  And Congress has to keep an eye on it all.

I cannot understand how people like this sleep at night. Except maybe in an expensive bed in a big house in an exclusive gated community that the rest of America will never experience.

Shame on them.




Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Weinstein”. All you need to say to shut up the morality police that is Hollywood.

The number of people who were harmed by this man is horrifying.  The number of people who KNEW about this man is even more horrifying!

Listen, Hollywood is filled with loose morals and men and woman doing what they think they have to do to get a break.  None of that makes it right.  But outside the damage to the people, which is profound and unforgivable, there is the fact that this person (and I’m sure many others- like Bryan Singer) has given America a “STFU” card they can use on Hollywood every time one of those moralistic idiots runs their mouth about woman’s rights, how conservatives are abusive to women, or whatever clap trap that comes along.

One of them gets going just look dead at them and say “Weinstein” and walk away.

Image result for Weinstein Matt damon George clooney

They knew. But it is, and has always been, about the power and access. What’s a few starlets, right guys?

How bad is this guy? There are dozens of women coming forward now, stretching back to the nineties?  Worse, the men in Hollywood knew. They had to. It was their co-stars and girlfriends who were subject to the abuse.  Even Brad Pitt told Weinstein if he kept it up with his girlfriend at the time he was going to give Weinstein a “Missouri whooping”.   Yet everyone kept right on working with him, making him richer and more powerful and more dangerous.  PJ Media talks about what a real man is like, hint- not these guys.

It seems that Weinstein’s behavior was an open secret in Hollywood; it’s highly likely that many of those saying they knew nothing about his proclivities were actually well aware of them. Through it all, we’ve seen only a handful of cases of anyone doing or saying anything.

Brad Pitt is reported to have threatened Weinstein with a “Missouri whooping” after the producer pulled his act with Pitt’s then-girlfriend Gwyneth Paltrow. Seth MacFarlane admits a joke he made at Weinstein’s expense while hosting the Oscars was made out of malice.

That’s about it.

Pitt did nothing else about Weinstein — he even worked with him on projects later. I’d be willing to give MacFarlane a pass because he only admits to knowing one of the victims, one who asked him not to retaliate in any way.

In all of Hollywood, those are about the only cases we see of any man being willing to stand up to Weinstein in any way, and they did nothing particularly meaningful.

Ronan Farrow , on the other hand, did something meaningful. He put the piece together. NBC tanked it because they felt it didn’t have enough “there there”, which of course is crap.  This is a good article and very accurate to what people like Weinstein do.  Here is a piece of the article dealing with the NYPD and DA aftermath.  The DA decided not to prosecute, even though it was a decent case. Power provides privilege.  The DA, Cyrus Vance Jr, said there wasn’t enough evidence. Then after he refusal, the lawyer for Weinstein gave Vance Jr a large campaign contribution.  Nice work if you can find it I guess…

It also highlights what TMZ found out. Weinstein was so bad at this the company WROTE it in his contract!

Two sources close to the police investigation of Weinstein said that they had no reason to doubt Gutierrez’s account of the incident. One of them, a police source, said that the department had collected more than enough evidence to prosecute Weinstein. But the other said that Gutierrez’s statements about her past complicated the case for the office of the Manhattan District Attorney, Cyrus Vance, Jr. After two weeks of investigation, the D.A.’s office decided not to file charges. The office declined to comment on this story but pointed me to its statement at the time: “This case was taken seriously from the outset, with a thorough investigation conducted by our Sex Crimes Unit. After analyzing the available evidence, including multiple interviews with both parties, a criminal charge is not supported.”

“We had the evidence,” the police source involved in the operation told me. “It’s a case that made me angrier than I thought possible, and I have been on the force a long time.”

Gutierrez, when contacted for this story, said that she was unable to discuss the incident. Someone close to the matter told me that, after the D.A.’s office decided not to press charges, Gutierrez, facing Weinstein’s legal team, and in return for a payment, signed a highly restrictive nondisclosure agreement with Weinstein, including an affidavit stating that the acts he admits to in the recording never happened.

Weinstein’s use of such settlements was reported by the Times and confirmed to me by numerous people. A former employee with firsthand knowledge of two settlement negotiations that took place in London in the nineteen-nineties recalled, “It felt like David versus Goliath . . . the guy with all the money and the power flexing his muscle and quashing the allegations and getting rid of them.”

Here is the TMZ link.

TMZ is privy to Weinstein’s 2015 employment contract, which says if he gets sued for sexual harassment or any other “misconduct” that results in a settlement or judgment against TWC, all Weinstein has to do is pay what the company’s out, along with a fine, and he’s in the clear.

According to the contract, if Weinstein “treated someone improperly in violation of the company’s Code of Conduct,” he must reimburse TWC for settlements or judgments. Additionally, “You [Weinstein] will pay the company liquidated damages of $250,000 for the first such instance, $500,000 for the second such instance, $750,000 for the third such instance, and $1,000,000 for each additional instance.”

The contract says as long as Weinstein pays, it constitutes a “cure” for the misconduct and no further action can be taken. Translation — Weinstein could be sued over and over and as long as he wrote a check, he keeps his job.

The contract has specific language as to when the Board of Directors can fire Weinstein — if he’s indicted or convicted of a crime, but that doesn’t apply here.

There’s another provision … he can be fired for “the perpetuation by you [Weinstein] of a material fraud against the company.” The question … where’s the fraud? Lance Maerov, the board member who negotiated Weinstein’s 2015 contract, said in an interview — and we’ve confirmed — the Board knew Weinstein had settled prior lawsuits brought by various women, but they “assumed” it was to cover up consensual affairs. The Board’s assumption does not constitute fraud on Weinstein’s part.

NBC is going to have to let the head guy go that tanked the article. Sooner or later it will come out he was complicit in the denial and somehow the girls who were in this article were identified by Weinstein’s lawyers.  Which means somebody probably told on them….?

All of this boils down to the fact Hollywood loves to lecture you on your morality and “Toxic masculinity” when in fact the greatest offenders ARE the Hollywood elite.

So next time someone on the Left says something just look at them and reply “Weinstein.”

Then walk away.



Posted in politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Vegas shooting and the question of why. FBI’s reputation clouds the effort to find out what happened.


This post has been edited to allow for the updates from last week until this week – things have changed.


There was an interview with a local reporter in Vegas talking about their Sheriff.  The young reporter said that Sheriff Lombardo had made a point to be as frank and transparent as he could since taking control of the department.  However, there are now problems with the time line that made the conspiracy nuts have a field day.  Worse, the political issues are now coming to the forefront.

The problem the Sheriff has is he let the FBI trot him out to be the spokesman while they “took control” of the investigation and promptly mucked it up.   Which is not surprising, considering the political animal the FBI has become.

TCTH has two posts. One is the latest on the time line the police keep managing to get wrong.  The other is TCTH just reflecting the frustration of what many feel. Why the police do not tell the truth when it is far better to do so is maddening.  Especially here.  However, there is a reason for all this, and it’s called politics.

After reviewing the latest press conference by Las Vegas Sheriff Joseph Lombardo a few issues rise to the surface.   America doesn’t need tears – America needs answers.

First, on the matter of Lombardo’s defensive act, and anger toward people creating alternate theories to reconcile their official contradictions. It is ridiculous for law enforcement (2 weeks post shooting) to claim they want the public’s help, and yet simultaneously hold press briefings where they refuse to answer questions.

If they want the “alternate theories” to stop – then simply deliver honest and accurate information.  It has been two weeks.  For the FBI and LVMPD to claim they cannot yet present a valid and reasonable sequence of events in the worst mass shooting in U.S. history is abjectly indefensible.  Apparently the internal definition of “public servant” has been lost.

If there are, as continually claimed, NO ADDITIONAL “subjects of interest”, or “additional actors”, in the crime – there is no reasonable excuse for not providing information.

It then becomes further ridiculous for the same sheriff to direct his ire against those who seek information from law enforcement, yet simultaneously claim a desire for transparency and refuse to answer reasonable questions.   These mutually exclusive statements and behaviors do not reconcile.

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police leadership are creating a public spotlight of ineptitude and malfeasance upon themselves; no-one else is to blame.  LVMPD is doing this to themselves.  It has been two weeks since the shooting.

The Sheriff isn’t “doing it to himself” exactly. What has happened is he allowed himself and his department to get swept up into the politics of the FBI.

In a conversation with my ex-partner, who worked with them for  long time, I was reminded exactly why it is happening the way it is.  First, the FBI furiously guards its self proclaimed reputation of being the premier law enforcement agency in the world.  The truth is they are not.  Their ability comes more from just being big and having the power of government behind them rather than their street level investigative skills.

In fact, as my friend pointed out, the average patrolman from a mid-sized city will encounter, interview, obtain confessions from and arrest more serious and dangerous felons in one year than some agents do in their entire careers.  He added that the FBI profilers spend most of their time reading what other profilers wrote rather than in the street interviewing bad guys.  This creates a level of inefficiency that is only covered up by their overwhelming size and power.

Paddock is causing them trouble and it shows. Don’t get me wrong, there are good agents in the field, many former local police.  But their abilities are often crippled by the top down bureaucracy of the FBI. Trust me, they don’t do anything their bosses don’t know about ahead of time. It’s all about controlling the narrative.

(On a side note, has anyone asked lately how an FBI agent followed two terrorists he was involved with to the Garland TX shooting and didn’t tell anyone? I know Congress tried and the FBI did the Det Frank Drebin move.)

WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley today is calling on the FBI to explain its advance knowledge and any plan to thwart a 2015 terrorist attack in Garland, Texas.  Grassley’s questions follow recent media reports revealing that an undercover FBI agent was not only in communication with the terrorists weeks before the attack, but the agent was also at the scene taking pictures of the terrorists seconds before the shooting began.  However, in 2015, FBI Director James Comey indicated that the Bureau was not aware of the perpetrator’s plans to travel to Garland or of any plans to carry out the attack.

According to news reports, an undercover FBI agent had been in communication over social media with one of the terrorists, Elton Simpson, in the weeks leading up to the terrorist attack.  In one of the communications with the undercover agent, Simpson shared a link to information about the “Draw Prophet Muhamad Contest,” to which the agent replied, “Tear up Texas.” Simpson replied, “Bro, you don’t have to say that,” and “No need to be direct,” and referenced a terrorist attack in Paris.  The day of the attack, the agent was in a car directly behind Simpson and his associate, Nadir Soofi, near a police checkpoint.  The agent was taking photos of the terrorists just before the shooting began. A local police officer fatally shot both terrorists.

Despite the communications between the agent and Simpson, as well as court filings and news reports that reveal the agent was present at the scene during the attack, Comey told reporters in the days following the attack that the FBI had no reason to believe that Simpson intended to attack the event and was unaware of any plans to travel to Garland.

In a letter today to Comey, Grassley is seeking details on the circumstances surrounding the FBI’s investigation into Simpson, including when it became aware that the agent was traveling to Garland, whether it suspected Simpson of planning an attack and what plans were in place to intervene.

Comey is scheduled to testify at an FBI oversight hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 3.

(Of course Trump fired Comey.  Frankly, this would be reason enough.  Those people in Garland got lucky ONE Texas officer with ONE gun was better than the two terrorists.  Or we’d have another massacre on the nation’s hands.)

My buddy’s  advice to the Sheriff would be to make sure his local detectives work the case while the FBI is only in support.  That has not happened.   I was kidding the other day when I said that there are three agents working on this; one is holding a square peg of reality while two others are taking turns hitting it with sledgehammers trying to drive the peg into the FBI approved round hole!

The Sheriff now knows the cost of the deal he struck with the FBI.  He is being destroyed and he knows it.  And it is causing him great stress.

The second and probably as powerful political influence is that of the casinos in Vegas. MGM owns the Mandalay.  The Mandalay is going to get hit with so many lawsuits that it won’t recover for years.  They know it, we know it.  In the world of liability, this case is going to sting. You have twenty-two thousand potential victims of something from deaths to gunshot wounds to injuries caused by the chaos to people just suffering from PTSD.  The hotel will be crushed.

They have hired PR people and I’m sure every lawyer in the surrounding area to get ready.  The casinos are the biggest political player in Vegas. They want to make sure the narrative doesn’t force them to change their procedures. The last thing they need is metal detectors and security guards wanding every gambler, tourist and family that comes to the hotel for a vacation. Imagine going to see some circus or Wayne Newton or some other deal and having to stand in a TSA line!

People make fun of the J Edgar Hoover era. He was corrupted by the power he held, but his agents were different back then. He demanded they be of high character, talented, single (he didn’t want distractions from the job), devoted to the agency and hard working.  They carried the standard of the FBI with them everywhere.

However, today’s FBI is not that FBI.   Sure politics is involved in anything that has power I get that,  but at some point the agency went into a super charged mode.  It seems today politics rules everything they do. And that change was accelerated and exposed in the past eight years by Obama.  From the Fast and the Furious to the IRS scandal to the mess they made of the investigations of Hasan, Mateen and the rest, the FBI has traded its drive for justice for it protecting its reputation beyond all other things.


Image result for Andrew McCabe

Andrew McCabe. One of the political embeds.

Even if their intentions are good when they are trying to do their jobs, or if they are just wrong, the taint remains.  Add to this the intentional stymying of FOIA requests made by independent groups, the former director manipulating events to create a special counsel (including lying to Congress) and you can see how when the FBI speaks people just discount their honesty.

Tom Fitton has been on the front lines as the head of Judicial Watch as they file one FOIA lawsuit after another in pursuit of the truth when it comes to Hillary’s emails, Benghazi, Obama unmasking scandal etc. so it’s no surprise that he came out and straight up said he doesn’t trust the FBI as they conduct an investigation into 64-year-old Stephen Paddock.

Which is why the SAC in Vegas made a deal to trot out the Sheriff and make him give the FBI approved statements.

Paddock’s act is known.  Paddock’s motivation is said to be a mystery.  What is happening is that Paddock has a motive, it’s just not low hanging fruit like Mateen. Which I will remind you the FBI tried to change per Obama. Even though Mateen stated clearly he was an Islamic terrorist pledging his loyalty to ISIS – repeatedly.

Fox had a criminal psychiatrist explain the difference between young and old mass killers.  Basically, young people do it for attention and fame.  Older killers do not act for attention. They act to make a statement and effect change.

For example, Mateen was an older mature mass killer.  He had a statement to make and wanted to effect change in something. He wanted to show America that ISIS could strike inside the nation and he wanted us to stop bombing Syria where we were targeting “his brothers.”  Statement/effect.

Hodgkinson targeted Republicans because his side- the Left- convinced him they were all monsters killing old people, stealing money, stripping healthcare away and starving kids and of course kicking puppies.  He believed that the only way to stop the Trump/Republican train was to stop the Republicans. He targeted one tenth of the Republican Congress, stalked the site (like Paddock), he researched the target (like Paddock)and had a list of Republicans in his pocket and Scalise’s photo on his computer, rifle in his car.   He was planning to kill them all because they were bad (statement) and effect change by locking down Congress in a state of confusion for a year.

(Ignore the Alex Jones Info War introduction. Oddly, this is the only video clip I could find with the interview…hello Google..?)

So what motivated Paddock?

That’s the question that is causing the FBI to push the Sheriff out into the public to me crushed. They don’t know. Or- because we don’t believe them-  they do and don’t want to tell us because they think they know better and we can’t handle it.

At this point, the Sheriff’s credibility is suffering, which means the vacuum will be filled with conspiracy.

And it all could have been avoided.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The NFL has no idea how bad it screwed up. A personal story

That will explain it all.

I have a friend who loves the Dallas Cowboys.  He was born in NYC, joined the Army and was stationed in Texas for awhile.  During that time he fell in love with the Cowboys.  That love affair led to generations of friendly and some not so friendly rivalry with his family in New York!  He is such a fan he had signed memorabilia from players all the way back to the days of the “Manster”.

Image result for autograph pic of the Dallas Cowboy Randy White

His prized possession!

When he divorced he wanted three things; custody of his son (which he got), the big screen TV and his Cowboy gear.  We snuck his TV out, he won in court and he got most of his gear.  The ex did manage to throw out a few things, which led to when mentioning her name he did it with the ring of a Gypsy curse and the mandatory spitting in the dirt!

Even when he couldn’t rub two nickels together he bought the NFL package so he would not miss his beloved Cowboys.  Thick or thin, win or lose, he was faithful.  Even when they lost a playoff game or had a horrible season, the second the game was over he would turn to me and say “Next Year Baby!”

Until now.   When Jerry Jones knelt along with his players I sent him a text telling him.  He responded he knew and this- “Cancelled my NFL ticket, I’m done.”

This would be akin to a mother giving up on her child.  Your dog suddenly thinking you aren’t all that.  God rescinding his offer of forgiveness to mankind!  I mean epic world ending stuff!

My son texted me when he heard “Did anyone check to see if Hell is frozen?”

We all know why the black culture is in free fall. They know it too. But so many generations of us giving them another go at it has finally tired the nation out. This act has sheered the sheep too close and killed it. So instead of the expected “ahhh, it isn’t REALLY your fault.” They got a collective nationwide raspberry. And they are crazy mad about it.

The players never EVER knelt against black gang crime or the deaths in Chicago or the unwed mothers suffering or fatherless children.  (Many created unwed mothers so… not a big issue for them?) Or the drugs, or the violence, or the poor education foisted on them by their “get rich on  the back of others” democrats in cities like Baltimore.  THAT should be the offense.  The lie of Ferguson and bigger lie that  the police are wantonly  killing unarmed blacks should not be what drives them, but…

As for the NFL owners, a bunch of rich men and women who play with the teams like toys.  I think they succumbed to the fact 77% of their players are from those affected neighborhoods and many are just fast, uneducated thugs.  Which is why I stopped watching years ago.  I missed Paul Warfield or Mark Clayton or Jerry Rice. Today, nothing is appealing when I see a wide receiver pout if he didn’t get the ball or show off it he scores.

I missed the professionalism of a player who when he tackled someone he just got up and walked back to the huddle like he had done it before, not dance and prance and make silly moves.  Especially when that was one of a few tackles the guy made and his team was getting smoked.  I have no idea why, which is why I stopped watching.

I also don’t watch Breaking Bad, The Sopranos, Sons of Anarchy or any show that elevates criminal/ anti-social behavior to a moral high ground.

Anyway, my point is if you lost my friend, you are right at the edge of chaos.

Or as the Ghostbusters put it-




Posted in politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment