AGW strikes down another critic. He gave up because being knee deep in greed and stupidity was offensive.

Roger Cohen tried.  But then he realized it was foolish to try and get a  pig to sing, especially if the pig was getting paid billions by those who want to further steal your money and freedom. It amazes me how on a global level we’ve allowed a few liberal and socialists and control freaks to ruin our lives. As of now we can’t get 75 watt bulbs because of the global warming. Next it will be 60 watt then 40 watt incandescent bulbs.  I know stupid.  China is pumping out CO2 by the ton, the climate is cooling and I’m in the dark.  Go figure.

What is the key to getting people to believe a lie? First you don’t let opposing voice be heard. Second, you tell the lie big enough and often enough, until it becomes the truth- facts and evidence be damned.

Perhaps the most inconvenient fact is the lack of global warming for well over 10 years now. This is known to the warming establishment, as one can see from the 2009 “Climategate” email of climate scientist Kevin Trenberth: “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.” But the warming is only missing if one believes computer models where so-called feedbacks involving water vapor and clouds greatly amplify the small effect of CO2.

The lack of warming for more than a decade—indeed, the smaller-than-predicted warming over the 22 years since the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) began issuing projections—suggests that computer models have greatly exaggerated how much warming additional CO2 can cause. Faced with this embarrassment, those promoting alarm have shifted their drumbeat from warming to weather extremes, to enable anything unusual that happens in our chaotic climate to be ascribed to CO2.

The fact is that CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is a colorless and odorless gas, exhaled at high concentrations by each of us, and a key component of the biosphere’s life cycle. Plants do so much better with more CO2 that greenhouse operators often increase the CO2 concentrations by factors of three or four to get better growth. This is no surprise since plants and animals evolved when CO2 concentrations were about 10 times larger than they are today. Better plant varieties, chemical fertilizers and agricultural management contributed to the great increase in agricultural yields of the past century, but part of the increase almost certainly came from additional CO2 in the atmosphere.

Although the number of publicly dissenting scientists is growing, many young scientists furtively say that while they also have serious doubts about the global-warming message, they are afraid to speak up for fear of not being promoted—or worse. They have good reason to worry. In 2003, Dr. Chris de Freitas, the editor of the journal Climate Research, dared to publish a peer-reviewed article with the politically incorrect (but factually correct) conclusion that the recent warming is not unusual in the context of climate changes over the past thousand years. The international warming establishment quickly mounted a determined campaign to have Dr. de Freitas removed from his editorial job and fired from his university position. Fortunately, Dr. de Freitas was able to keep his university job.

This is not the way science is supposed to work, but we have seen it before—for example, in the frightening period when Trofim Lysenko hijacked biology in the Soviet Union. Soviet biologists who revealed that they believed in genes, which Lysenko maintained were a bourgeois fiction, were fired from their jobs. Many were sent to the gulag and some were condemned to death.

Why is there so much passion about global warming, and why has the issue become so vexing that the American Physical Society, from which Dr. Giaever resigned a few months ago, refused the seemingly reasonable request by many of its members to remove the word “incontrovertible” from its description of a scientific issue? There are several reasons, but a good place to start is the old question “cui bono?” Or the modern update, “Follow the money.”

Alarmism over climate is of great benefit to many, providing government funding for academic research and a reason for government bureaucracies to grow. Alarmism also offers an excuse for governments to raise taxes, taxpayer-funded subsidies for businesses that understand how to work the political system, and a lure for big donations to charitable foundations promising to save the planet. Lysenko and his team lived very well, and they fiercely defended their dogma and the privileges it brought them.

Really folks, the fact you can’t see in the darkened room very well because your CFL or LED light doesn’t work right is because it was and is all about the money.

Roger Cohen tried to change this, but humans are stupid, shallow and greedy.  And the one area we all thought was a little above the human condition was science.  Even that now is compromised.

Listen, they have the power ONLY because they took it and we allowed it to happen.  They are a minority supported by ignorant people.  Sooner or later, their game will be up. But I fear only after irreversible damage has been done.

That’s when we hold them accountable.

This entry was posted in AGW, Cohen, corrupt, politics, power, resignation, scam, science. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply