That’s Neo from the Matrix, and Julius Caesar, former head of Rome, who found out violating the trust of the people is dangerous. I’m going to copy and paste his words into my blog and then pretty much go “What he said” which is usually reserved for Charles Krauthammer and Victor Davis Hanson.
As the founders knew, however, the power we grant the state to defend us can easily be turned against us. The means of defence against foreign danger, Madison wrote, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home. Going back even farther, this was why the supporters of republican government stuck the long knives into Julius Caesar. In crossing the Rubicon, he violated the law by bringing the Roman army into Italy. This effectively turned the means of protecting the republic into the tool for establishing imperial rule.
In the Second Amendment, the founding fathers sought to protect us against any Rubicon-crossing by granting Americans the right to bear their own arms and form home militias. We own guns, in other words, to defend ourselves from the possibility of government tyranny. It is part of our foundational contract with the American state. This is why, whenever some anti-gun idiot on television cries out, Why would a hunter need an automatic rifle? the correct answer is well, unprintable. The hunter has a 30-06 in his gun cabinet for hunting. The M-16 he hides in the cellar is for the next American Revolution.As with the death penalty, the argument of the progressives is that times and people have changed. Our democratic institutions and traditions are now engraved upon our hearts, they say, and no longer require the elaborate constitutional safeguards the founders provided for us. Civilized by the years, our leaders no longer pose the threat of tyranny, and guns only serve to give the anarchic power of death to individual lunatics and rednecks when it should be reserved to the state.
The conservative argument is, to put it succinctly: Not so much. Once again, we aggravating creatures of the right cant help pointing out that human nature has changed neither a jot nor a tittle since we hightailed it out of Eden. Those who in ancient days sought to rule us in the name of our own good are still among us, and the only thing that keeps them on their side of the Rubicon is, in the words of that great patriot Neo from The Matrix: Guns. Lots of guns.
History supports the right in this. Four hundred years of Roman republicanism was not enough to keep the Caesars at bay, and theres no cause to believe itll be any different here. If freedom is what were after, the conservative argument to preserve the second amendment clearly holds good.
There is, however, some question about whether freedom is, in fact, what the progressives are after.
Which is only one more reason to hang onto your weapons!
Here is something sent to my by a friend that answers the foolishness of Cuomo’s position.