Update on can she be that stupid. Apparently so. But then again….

There is a LONG list of women who have done bad, and most likely, illegal things for the liberal agenda and none of them are in jail.  Some examples are; Mills, Huma, Hall, Lerner.  None are in jail. None.  So Evelyn Farkas may truly believe her ideology is some kind of shield. As I said in the last post, this girl is a true believer. Just look at the energy in her crazy eyes!

HUGE! Obama Defense Official & Hillary Adviser Evelyn Farkas Was Illegally Fed Secret Trump Info (VIDEO)

Not for nothing Comey but here’s a warrant target… Jeezz..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, if someone has a direct line to Director Comey they should call him and say “THIS IS THE CYBER WARRANT YOU NEED TO EXECUTE!” She is like the guy who boasts to everyone he helped set up the bank robbery for his buddies and texted them with suggestions during the actual crime!!!

Holy crap James, grab her data up, her emails (including her fake name emails so popular with the Obama appointees) and texts and you will find at least the beginning of the nexus of like minded offenders. Also you may see illegal communications between her and her buddies still in government? They don’t seem to care, so sloppy may be their SOP.

Outside the amount of data collected that needs to be filtered, this case is literally making itself.  Even the dumbest agent can work it!

Evelyn Farkas is the former Obama administration deputy secretary of defense — and now an MSNBC analyst. Appearing on air among her friends at MSNBC yesterday, she all but outed herself as a key source for the seminal New York Times story on the Obama administration’s efforts to subvert the incoming Trump administration.

The March 1 Times story ran under the headline “Obama administration rushed to preserve intelligence of Russian election hacking” under the byline of Matthew Rosenberg, Adam Goldman and Michael Schmidt. The Times reporters noted that they protected the identity of their sources because, you know, their cooperation with the Times was criminal or because their actions were otherwise legally problematic. The Times reporters put it this way in their March 1 story:

More than a half-dozen current and former officials described various aspects of the effort to preserve and distribute the intelligence, and some said they were speaking to draw attention to the material and ensure proper investigation by Congress. All spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were discussing classified information, nearly all of which remains secret.

In her comments on MSNBC the morning the Times story appeared in print, Farkas used a term of art that requires translation. The term of art is “the Hill,” i.e., Capitol Hill. By “the Hill” Farkas means congressional Democrats and their staffers. As MSNBC flashed an image of the Times story on the screen, Mika Brzezinski stated that Farkas “actually knew about this attempt to get and preserve information…and were doing some work yourself.” That’s nice “work” if you can get it.

Thus spake Farkas:

Well, I was urging my former colleagues, and, and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill, it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration. Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left. So it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods — meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence. So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia. So then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to the Hill…That’s why you have the leaking.

Farkas is an expert in the Eastern European/Russian relationships and a believer that the Russians are the bad guys.  She is also very supportive of Ukraine. A Neo-con perhaps.

The Atlantic Council today named Evelyn Farkas, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia/Ukraine/Eurasia, as a Nonresident Senior Fellow with appointments in the Future Europe Initiative, Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center, and Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security.

During her tenure from 2012 to 2015 as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia/Ukraine/Eurasia, Dr. Farkas was responsible for policy toward Russia, the Black Sea, Balkans, and Caucasus regions and conventional arms control. From 2010 to 2012 she served as Senior Adviser to the Supreme Allied Commander Europe/Commander, US European Command, and as Special Adviser for the Secretary of Defense for the NATO Summit. Prior to that she served almost a decade in the legislative branch working on  stability and special operations, counterterrorism, counterproliferation,  export controls, defense policy toward Latin America and US-Asia policy. From 1997-2000 she served as a professor of international relations at the US Marine Corps Command and Staff College.

At the Atlantic Council, Dr. Farkas will focus on Russia, Ukraine, and Eastern Europe; general European affairsand global security issues.

“We are delighted to welcome Dr. Farkas, one of the most well-known and well-respected authorities on Eastern Europe, Russia, and Ukraine, to the Atlantic Council,” said John Herbst, Director of the Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center. “She brings a wealth of knowledge and first-hand experience engaging with our partners in the region, and we look forward to drawing on her expertise as we continue to deepen our team of experts on Eastern Europe and Eurasia.”

I am becoming convinced she is part of a cabal that wishes the US/NATO would secure Ukraine from the Russians.  If you throw in that aspect, and the fact Crowdstrike is from that same area of the world and is part of the Atlantic Council, suddenly all the conspiracy theorist perk up.  Is all of this a false flag operation?

what’s weird enough, but it gets far stranger. For example:

In lieu of substantive evidence provided to the public that the alleged hacks which led to Wikileaks releases of DNC and Clinton Campaign Manager John Podesta’s emails were orchestrated by the Russian Government, CrowdStrike’s bias has been cited as undependable in its own assessment, in addition to its skeptical methods and conclusions. The firm’s CTO and co-founder, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a think tank with openly anti-Russian sentiments that is funded by Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, who also happened to donate at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation.

In 2013, the Atlantic Council awarded Hillary Clinton it’s Distinguished International Leadership Award. In 2014, the Atlantic Council hosted one of several events with former Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who took over after pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych was ousted in early 2014, who now lives in exile in Russia.

THIS IS THE SCANDAL that needs to be investigated. What if all of this was a set up to undermine Trump so they can start a freaking war with Russia??!

Holy treason Batman!

This entry was posted in politics and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply