Posts Tagged ‘Russia’

Conspiracy? No.Taking advantage of a crisis- sadly yes.

Wednesday, April 24th, 2013

A guy I know started talking about the bombing as though it was staged or some other crazy crap. He was listening to the conspiracy theorists claiming all kinds of idiotic things. I warned him off of the direction.  Yet, it does give rise to the question why do so many people think the government is always trying something?

Sadly, because more than once, they are.  It isn’t the 24 plot type of actions or the standard CIA is always the bad guy scenarios we see in movies. It is usually just someone trying to clean up something stupid. And in doing so making so many clumsy attempts it looks like some kind of conspiracy.

For example, we’ve seen Napolitano jump up and down denying any knowledge of either the Saudi or the bomber brothers. Then suddenly, after being forced to respond to evidence, she has all kinds of information about them and acts stunned that we are stunned that she was so clueless, or conniving.

Is she some kind of Janet Reno evil genius?  Hardly.  But she is a good order follower and her orders are clear- hide as much as possible from public scrutiny. Somebody on the inside appears to be altering records.  Sound bad right?

What if the Saudi Beck and others are highlighting is nothing more than some rich kid who was “speed passed” through the system so he could come here and screw around, like any other spoiled rich kid.  Big deal. Except that it highlights the corruption inside the system for the privileged few.

So instead of owning up, they’ll mess around making it look worse. Like Nixon found out, it is never the crime, it is always the cover up

All administrations do some of this. All bureaucracies do some of this.  Sure there are cover ups, but it is less a shadow government and more “I just don’t want to get fired.” thing.

Right now, as I’ve said repeatedly the FBI and DHS are in another, yes ANOTHER, turf war over who screwed what up.  But that is a distraction.  The real issue is policy.  Benghazi was a White House policy blunder, it just landed on top of Stevens and the others and Hillary- once again- took one for the man she serves. (That alone should make all women hate her!)

The policy and procedures and limits placed on the FBI agents by the DOJ is another policy blunder. I watched as Napolitano did her best sluggish stare as the Congressmen, including Lindsey Graham, ask her to explain what happened.  She says the guy “pinged” when he left for Russia, but didn’t “ping” upon his return because the text alert from the FBI had expired.

Think about the situation for a minute.  Is she saying that there is a system in place that limits the amount of time the FBI can request information on people from other agencies?  Or is it only Muslim people because its fears the political blowback from Muslims?  Is she is saying that the intelligence effort in our nation, the one we keep hearing needs more power over law abiding citizens, has an expiration date like a gallon of milk?

Who else knows that?  So a terrorists gets up on the radar screen and his advisers say “Keep cool Achmed for ninety days, then the file will automatically close and you can go back to building bombs?”

Look, Tamerlan was almost cartoonish South Park character in his stereotypical development of what a home grown terrorist should look like.  The crazy thing as while he was checking off all the boxes that prove he is a terrorist including; 1. radicalization of religion 2. angry outbursts 3. questionable Internet searches. 4. Mysterious domestic contacts.  4. Radical and threaten statements 5. The travel and training to a terrorist hotspot AND THEN had Russia intel tell us about HIM. Not a group, not a theory, not chatter…HIM!!!

At the same time, the FBI was going down its politically correct and impotent list and finding none of that means anything in the Obama administration’s view.

And trust me, it is ALL about that not coming to light.

My issue isn’t the screw ups as much as it is the feds want MORE power and control over law abiding citizens and they can’t effectively use the tools we gave them already!  DOJ is arguing they want cellphone records, texting records and email records on all Americans to be saved for years in case a crime is committed and they can go back and prove we did it.  They want more guns and more bullets.  They want to fly drones over your head and watch what you are doing.

Yet, when the bad guys are in front of them in real time, PC prevents them from acting.

Dumb.

 

 

From Powerline. Why does evil make liberal stupid. Well put.

Monday, April 22nd, 2013

John at Powerline makes a good point. Liberalism, like political correctness will get us all killed.

_____

—In the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing, we are suffering through the inevitable period of liberal hand-wringing. Liberals can’t help themselves: while normal people are reviling the bombers, celebrating their capture or death, and debating measures that can be taken to prevent future atrocities, liberals’ thinking (if you can call it that) goes in a different direction. Liberals call for understanding; tell the rest of us we don’t realize how complex mass murder is; recommend introspection (But why? I didn’t do it.); and warn against various forms of overreaction to the latest terrorist outrage. The reality of evil, a constant in human affairs for millennia, renders liberals not speechless–that would be too much to hope for–but incoherent.f

These days there are more such outpourings of liberal feelings than one can count, but let’s note just two, for now. First, Governor Deval Patrick, who appeared on Face the Nation this morning:

The governor of Massachusetts said Sunday that he has no idea what motivated the brothers accused of exploding two bombs near the finish line of the Boston Marathon.

Really? Hmm. Check out the Boston Globe, Governor. They think Islam might have played a secondary role.

Speaking on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” Gov. Deval Patrick said it’s hard to imagine why someone would deliberately harm “innocent men, women and children in the way that these two fellows did.”

It is, indeed, hard to imagine if you aren’t evil. But this is a banal and singularly unhelpful observation. Experience tells us that some people do indeed want to harm innocent men, women and children in this fashion. Muslims alone carry out, on the average, several terrorist attacks a day for the purpose of harming innocent men, women and children, and they are by no means the only source of evil in the world. So our public officials should stop expressing amazement at the existence of evil and start figuring out how to protect the rest of us from it.

This piece in The Atlantic is a good exemplar of the mushy liberal commentary that has proliferated in recent days. Authored by one Megan Garber, it is titled: “The Boston Bombers Were Muslim: So?” Before taking a close look at Ms. Garber’s article, let’s advise The Atlantic not to put away that headline. It could come in handy so often. “The Cole Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The Embassy Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The First World Trade Center Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The September 11 Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The Madrid Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The London Bombers Were Muslim: So?” “The Shoebomber Was Muslim: So?” The Underwear Bomber Was Muslim: So?” “The Fort Hood Shooter Was Muslim: So?” “The Beslan Child-Murderers Were Muslim: So?” “The Times Square Bomber Was Muslim: So?”

We could keep this up for a very long time, but let’s move on to Ms. Garber’s soulful meanderings. I will quote Garber at length, lest you think I am cherry-picking her musings to make her look stupid:

_____

A buddy of mine, another LEO went private contracting and spent time in Afghanistan. His summation is worth repeating. He said, and I paraphrase, “The truth is these people are the stupidest, most disinterested and incurious people I’ve ever met (and he’s from the hills of Arkansas and backwoods Tennessee!). They like being stupid. The like being told what to do. They like the idea of belonging to a tribe and being told what to think, who to marry, what to do. It gives them security.  The smart ones left with the Russians, if one is born smart now they realize soon enough the best thing is to get out.  What is left is simply unworkable.   If we want to change them and their beliefs we have to forget trying to change the adults and concentrate on the kids who are eight and ten years old. You want to make a difference, you had better be ready to stay for a generation.”

THIS is why the Left’s ideas and point of view don’t work. They cannot accept the huge chasm between what they believe is proper thinking and what the terrorists think is proper.  Listen, if you cannot understand your opponent, you cannot defeat your opponent, especially if he DOES understand you.

Liberalism and all that it brings to the real world is dangerous and frankly lethal.

Just ask the families of the dead and maimed about it.  If they knew the bombers got away with their crime because the new liberal definition of terrorism prevented good agents from acting, I think they’d be pretty pissed. Which is why you will see a pulling out of all the stops by the Left in order to excuse, confuse, obstruct and hide the truth.

I hope this time, unlike Benghazi, decent journalists will tell the truth. If not, be assured we’ll see this kind of thing happen again, and again.

Update:  It is already happening, even over at FOX.  A former career JTTF agent, now with his own company, explains how there are three levels of investigation- depending on the perceived threat.  One is called an assessment and is limited in scope, time and investigative effort.  This is the one the older brother fell under after another foreign agency- which is very well versed in what a Chechen terrorist looks like-  gave us a heads up.  During the explanation, the talking head girl agreed, asked a few questions but didn’t really grasp the issue here.

1. Who decides what level the threat assessment goes under and by what criteria and how long as that criteria been in effect?  (That’s a biggie in getting to the root of the problem)

2. Who signed off on this and did they do so reluctantly.  Remember, they go down a checklist and if the guy doesn’t meet minimum requirements he isn’t bumped up in the level of investigation. The case is closed.

3. At what point did the FBI or JTTF get another heads up and why didn’t they act then?  What triggers a second look?

4. Now the story is his name was misprinted by the airlines so it didn’t trigger anything at the FBI.  Seriously?  That is actually a real concern as the Russian alphabet does cause confusion, as does the Arabic (how many spellings of Gaddafi have you seen?).

However, it isn’t like we just discovered this problem, what have we done to address it?  Further, it isn’t like this guy was an unknown. He disappeared for six months from his life here and we didn’t know?

Many question unanswered.

 

 

 

 

If they weren’t stupid we’d never catch them.

Sunday, April 21st, 2013

Just a quick note about a couple of idiots being swept up by ICE.  They were associates of the bombers, and foreigners here on visa I would guess.  One of the idiots put this on the front of his car.

Arrest: License Plate Allegedly Belonging to a friend of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's Car Reading 'Terrorista #1'

Seriously.  You can’t make it up.

ICE is probably going to send them back to Russia, where the Russian intelligence agency will want to talk with them.  Russians hate Chechen terrorists more than we do. Those two idiots are about to find out how much.

Update:  Well they caught them.  Apparently, they were working hard to hide evidence of their buddy’s involvement. Now they are in jail.

 

 

 

Understanding Chechnya and its terrorists

Friday, April 19th, 2013

They scare Jihadists.  Chechnya has been at war, a violent VIOLENT war with Russia for years.  In fact, in the first war the Russians, mostly conscripts but heavily armed, went up against the fighters in Grozny.  They were beaten back and demoralized.  They eventually took the city, but only after they shelled it into rubble.  Think Stalingrad.  I remember the Left in America talking about how unfair this was.  But the Russians insisted they had no choice. These people were fighting to the death.  Not like Bin Laden or KSM.  These guys took it to a whole other level.

Like the Belus school massacre.

____

The Beslan school hostage crisis (also referred to as the Beslan school siege or Beslan massacre)[2][3][4] of early September 2004 lasted three days and involved the capture of over 1,100 people as hostages (including 777 children),[5] ending with the death of over 380 people. The crisis began when a group of armed Islamic separatist militants, mostly Ingush and Chechen, occupied School Number One (SNO) in the town of Beslan, North Ossetia (an autonomous republic in the North Caucasus region of the Russian Federation) on 1 September 2004. The hostage-takers were the Riyadus-Salikhin Battalion, sent by the Chechen separatist warlord Shamil Basayev, who demanded recognition of the independence of Chechnya at the UN and Russian withdrawal from Chechnya. On the third day of the standoff, Russian security forces entered the building with the use of tanks, incendiary rockets and other heavy weapons.[6] At least 334 hostages were killed as a result of the crisis, including 186 children,[7][8] with a significant number of people injured and reported missing.

The event led to security and political repercussions in Russia, most notably it contributed to a series of federal government reforms consolidating power in the Kremlin and strengthening of the powers of the President of Russia.[9] As of 2011, aspects of the crisis in relation to the militants remain contentious; including how many militants were involved, the nature of their preparations and whether a section of the group had escaped. Questions about the Russian government’s management of the crisis have also persisted; including allegations of disinformation and censorship in news media, whether the journalists who were present at Beslan were allowed to freely report on the crisis,[10] the nature and content of negotiations with the militants, allocation of responsibility for the eventual outcome, and perceptions that excessive force was used.[6][11][12][13][14]

______

Like the the Russian theater attack.

_____

The Moscow theater hostage crisis, also known as the 2002 Nord-Ost siege, was the seizure of the crowded Dubrovka Theater on 23 October 2002 by some 40 to 50 armed Chechens who claimed allegiance to the Islamist militant separatist movement in Chechnya.[1] They took 850 hostages and demanded the withdrawal of Russian forces from Chechnya and an end to the Second Chechen War. The siege was officially led by Movsar Barayev. After a two-and-a-half day siege, Russian Spetsnaz forces pumped an unknown chemical agent into the building’s ventilation system and raided it.[1]

During the raid, all 40 of the attackers were killed by Russian forces, and about 130 hostages died due to adverse reactions to the gas (including nine foreigners).[2] All but two of the hostages who died during the siege were killed by the toxic substance pumped into the theater to subdue the militants.[3][4] The use of the gas was widely condemned as heavy-handed, but Moscow insisted it had little room for manoeuvre, as they were faced with the prospect of 50 heavily armed rebels prepared to kill themselves and their hostages.[5] Physicians in Moscow condemned the refusal to disclose the identity of the gas that prevented them from saving more lives. However, some reports said the drug naloxone was successfully used to save some hostages.[6]

______

Like the “black widow” female suicide bombers.

________

The ranks of the Shahidkas are filled mainly with 15- to 19-year-old women. According to journalist Julia Jusik, many of the women have been sold by their parents to be used as shahidkas, others have been kidnapped or tricked.[5] Another group come from wahhabist families and are pressured to become shahidkas by their family. Many have been prepared to the suicide by way of narcotics and rapes. Several have been pregnant at the time.[5] However, Robert W. Kurz and Charles K. Bartles refuted this view, stating that in most cases the female Chechen suicide bombers do not fit this model.[3] Mostly they are given no training at all in preparation for the suicides as no weapon skill is needed to strap on the explosives.[5] Many do not even blow themselves up, but are blown up by remote control.[5][6][7] On the other hand, Besayev, as stated above, reported that the women are trained for their mission.[3] Michael Radu also argued that these women are specifically trained for suicide attacks.[8] Additionally, black widows can also be those whose brothers or close relatives were killed in one of the two Chechen wars between Russia and Islamist rebels since 1994 or indeed in clashes with Russian-backed forces.[1] Robert W. Kurz and Charles K. Bartles provide another view in regard to their motives and argued that these women are much more motivated by revenge, despair, and their drive for an independent state than by religious fundamentalism or individual honor.[3]

Notable attacks

  • Khava Barayeva is the first known ‘Black Widow’ who blew herself up at a Russian Army base in Chechnya in June 2000.[9]
  • Medna Bayrokova, a resident of Grozny, said that she remembers the day a middle aged woman came to her front door asking to speak to her 26-year old daughter, Zareta Bayrokova who was a tuberculosis patient. Medna Bayrokova let the woman in. Her daughter then spent an hour in her bedroom with the woman, before leaving the house. Zareta Bayrokova died in the Dubrovka Theater in 2002.[10]
  • In May 2003, Shakhida Baimuratova, a Black Widow suicide bomber killed 16 people and wounded 150 in an assassination attempt on then Moscow-appointed Chechen president Akhmad Kadyrov at a crowded Muslim festival in Ilishkan Yurt. A second woman bomber was also present but killed only herself.[3]
  • On 5 June 2003, a woman detonated the bomb in a bus carrying Russian Air Force pilots in North Ossetia, killing herself and 20 others and wounding 14.[3]
  • On 5 July 2003, two suicide bombers killed 16 people and injured six others at a rock concert at Tushino Airfield in Moscow.[11]
  • In December 2003, a male and female suicide bomber killed 46 people and injured 100 others by detonating explosives on a packed commuter train, which had just left Yessentuki in Southern Russia. The woman is believed to have carried explosives in a bag, whereas the man had grenades strapped to his leg.
  • On 9 December 2003, a bomb exploded outside the National hotel in Moscow just a few hundred metres from the Moscow Kremlin. It is thought that the target was the State Duma building and that the bomb had detonated prematurely. Six people died and 13 were injured in the blast. The suicide bomber was later identified as Khadishat Mangeriyeva.
  • On 6 February 2004, Georgi Trofimov, a Russian bomb disposal officer, was killed as he tried to defuse a device at a Moscow cafe. The failed bomber, ethnic Ingush Zarema Muzhakhoyeva, was sentenced to 20 years of imprisonment for terrorism in April 2004.[12] In 2005, she participated in the trial of the Beslan hostage crisis terrorist Nur-Pashi Kulayev as a witness for the prosecution, but she withdrew all her statements about Kulayev that she made in pre-trial depositions and said she didn’t know he was a militant.[13]
  • On 1 September 2004, two Chechen women, Roza Nagayeva and Mairam Taburova, were involved in the attack on a Russian, North-Ossetian school (the Beslan school hostage crisis). The attack which killed 334 civilians, including 186 children, was masterminded by Shamil Basayev.
  • On 29 March 2010, nearly 40 people were killed and another 100 injured when two suicide bombers detonated explosives at two stations of the Moscow subway, the Park Kultury metro station and at the Lubyanka station.[14] The attacks were linked to shahidkas by the Russian Government, although an investigation has yet to be undertaken. One of the perpetrators was Dagestani-born Dzhennet Abdurakhmanova (1992-2010), the widow of 30-year-old Umalat Magomedov who was killed by Russian forces on 31 December 2009.[15][16][14]
  • On 24 January 2011, 35 were killed and 180 wounded in Domodedovo, Russia’s busiest airport. Although the identity of those responsible for carrying out the attacks has not been officially confirmed, initial reports suggested that at least one Black Widow was involved, likely accompanied by a man.[17]
  • On 7 March 2012, a widow of a militant killed on 10-11 February 2012 near a village, Karabudakhkent, 40km (24 miles) south of Dagestan capital Makhachkala killed herself and five police officer and wounded two other in Karabudakhkent.[18]
  • On 28 August 2012, Sufi leader Said Afandi and six other people were killed in a suicide bomb attack in Dagestan. The attack was allegedly perpetrated by Russian Aminat Kurbanova who had converted to Islam. Her two former spouses were Islamic militants, and her third husband was a militant, too.[19]

_____

These people don’t play and are one of the many reasons why you see the good feds being unable to sleep at night and why they arm up the police.  If these guys decide its time to bring the war to us, it is going to get sporty to say the least.

Their goal is terror and two of them have successfully shut down a major American city.  Just two… Like the Wasp in my earlier post.

It is all about the mindset. Theirs is really bad. And they are never alone.

Update: For example, here is the father’s comments.

________

The father of suspected Boston Marathon bomber called on his son today to give up peacefully, but warned the U.S. that if his son is killed “all hell will break loose.”

Anzor Tsarnaev spoke to ABC News from his home in the Russian city of Makhachkala as Boston police carried out an intense dragnet for his son Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, survived a running gun battle with police during the night that left an MIT security officer dead and a Boston cop badly wounded. His older brother died in the shootout.

The father said he spoke to his sons by phone earlier this week. “We talked about the bombing. I was worried about then,” Anzor Tsarnaev said.

He said his sons reassured him, saying, “Everything is good, Daddy. Everything is very good.”

The elder Tsarnaev insisted that his sons were innocent, but said he would appeal to his son to “surrender peacefully.”

“Give up. Give up. You have a bright future ahead of you. Come home to Russia,” the dad said.

The father warned, however, “If they killed him, then all hell would break loose.”

___

The Russian police should do us a solid and go visit Mr. Tsarnaev and ask him gently “who else is going to cause trouble?”